I don’t understand your comment about CMS + svnpubsub. The Logging project has
multiple sub-sites and uses this approach.
Ralph
> On Sep 15, 2016, at 2:01 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> CMS uses SVN but is not the same thing.
>
> I think there are 3 ways to publish a site:
>
> svnpubsub - i.e. generate
Am 18.09.2016 um 13:58 schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
The problem with the current API is that we can't get rid of the "Object"
suffix:
public static void different(long, long, String, Object...)
public static void differentObject(T, T, String, Object...)
when I change the second method name to "dif
> On Sep 18, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
>> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 06:37
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Release "Apache Commons RNG" versio
> On Sep 18, 2016, at 12:20 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton
> wrote:
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
>> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 06:37
>> To: Commons Developers List
>> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Release "Apache Commons RNG" versio
Let's release RNG 1.0. If our customers see areas of improvements with
regard to modularization, i'm sure they will let us know. But it seems
to me this code base is fine for a 1.0 release. Release early and often.
--dave
On 09/18/2016 12:24 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 18/09/2016 à 13:57,
Le 18/09/2016 à 13:57, Gilles a écrit :
>
> I can't help it!
> I'll comment...
>
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:28:19 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>
> Try me. Really.
> What is your plan toward modularization?
>
> I've exposed mine, let's see yours.
I can't help it either, I'm a nice guy. I have no
> -Original Message-
> From: Oliver Heger [mailto:oliver.he...@oliver-heger.de]
> Sent: Sunday, September 18, 2016 06:37
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: [VOTE][RC2] Release "Apache Commons RNG" version 1.0
>
>
>
> Am 17.09.2016 um 18:13 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> > Hi All,
>
Hello Eyal,
yes you should close the PR against Commons Lang and create a new one for
Commons Text [1]. I think I can move the Issue to the Commons Text Project,
so you don't need to create a new one. General design discussions are
usually held on the mailing list. But details around a specific is
On 18/09/2016 12:51, Gilles wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:28:19 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 17/09/2016 à 13:34, Gilles a écrit :
>>
>>> Your behaviour is in blatant contradiction with the Apache
>>> motto, and this project's chair mantra (RERO), which is
>>> truly ignored by the facts.
>>
Am 17.09.2016 um 18:13 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> Hi All,
>
> Gilles: I can see you are frustrated by the late comments and opinions when
> the code has been sitting in the repo for all to see. I hope we can resolve
> all of this amicably.
>
> All: We have only one shot at 1.0, this will set the t
I can't help it!
I'll comment...
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:28:19 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 17/09/2016 à 13:34, Gilles a écrit :
[...]
[1] Work with me towards modularity.
No thanks, I'm not interested in working with someone not open to
others' views.
Try me. Really.
What is your
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 17:28:19 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 17/09/2016 à 13:34, Gilles a écrit :
Your behaviour is in blatant contradiction with the Apache
motto, and this project's chair mantra (RERO), which is
truly ignored by the facts.
RERO isn't the Apache motto
I didn't mean that it
The problem with the current API is that we can't get rid of the "Object"
suffix:
public static void different(long, long, String, Object...)
public static void differentObject(T, T, String, Object...)
when I change the second method name to "different" (or rename both to
notEquals), the method
Hello.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 16:07:41 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Hi Rob,
Rob Tompkins wrote:
Hello,
Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain,
I
would like to attempt working with some short term goals. The hope
here is
to think about questions along the lines of:
Ok, I'm convinced. Should I cancel my existing pull request and close the
existing jira issue (LANG-1266) and make a new jira issue? Do we need a new
thread (in the mailing list for this, or is working with comments in jira
enough?)
Regards,Eyal
On Thursday, September 15, 2016 8:37 PM, Ga
Hello,
sebb schrieb am So., 18. Sep. 2016 um 12:21 Uhr:
> I agree; use notEquals, greaterThan, lessThan
>
> 'different' is ambiguous - does it mean notSame or notEquals?
>
the latter.
>
> On 17 September 2016 at 16:57, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > JUnit makes the distinction between "same" for
I agree; use notEquals, greaterThan, lessThan
'different' is ambiguous - does it mean notSame or notEquals?
On 17 September 2016 at 16:57, Gary Gregory wrote:
> JUnit makes the distinction between "same" for the same object and "equals"
> and calling equals(), maybe this would help here.
>
> htt
17 matches
Mail list logo
