Hi,
I am trying to use the below command, but fails with Exit code 127.
Any help is appreciated.
String command = "su -l ambari-qa -c 'hdfs dfs -ls /'
CommandLine cmdLine = CommandLine.parse(command);
DefaultExecutor executor = new DefaultExecutor();
executor.execute();
{127=Process exited wi
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Matt Sicker wrote:
> On 17 September 2016 at 11:13, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> >
> > From my experience, when I or someone finds any problem with an RC I
> > rolled, I sigh, cancel, and redo; but not before complaining to myself
> that
> > if there where not 50 ste
On 17 September 2016 at 11:13, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> From my experience, when I or someone finds any problem with an RC I
> rolled, I sigh, cancel, and redo; but not before complaining to myself that
> if there where not 50 steps to do a release, it would be less of a pain.
>
Is there a jira is
Hi All,
Gilles: I can see you are frustrated by the late comments and opinions when
the code has been sitting in the repo for all to see. I hope we can resolve
all of this amicably.
All: We have only one shot at 1.0, this will set the tone for a 1.x line.
If things change/mature/break enough then
Le 17/09/2016 à 16:07, Jörg Schaible a écrit :
> +1 ... normally. However, IIRC correctly, Gilles once said that all the RNG
> stuff was never part of a release. In that case this code can be simply
> dropped.
Actually some of the RNG stuff has been in Commons Math for years, the
RandomGenerato
JUnit makes the distinction between "same" for the same object and "equals"
and calling equals(), maybe this would help here.
http://junit.org/junit4/javadoc/4.12/org/junit/Assert.html
Gary
On Sep 17, 2016 7:52 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
> Hi,
>
> LANG-1134 introduced new methods to Validate
Le 17/09/2016 à 13:34, Gilles a écrit :
> Your behaviour is in blatant contradiction with the Apache
> motto, and this project's chair mantra (RERO), which is
> truly ignored by the facts.
RERO isn't the Apache motto (and I'm not opposed to a release, I'm
opposed to declaring the current code as
Hi,
LANG-1134 introduced new methods to Validate. I'm not fond of the API as is
currently is. Here are my concerns:
- When comparing numeral values usually we talk about greaterThan and
lessThan. The new API in Validate uses "smaller" and "greater"
- we have a method called "different" which chec
+1
builds for my compiler zoo from source from version 1.7 to 1.9 under Linux.
Builds for 1.6 JDKs have to be made using a profile, but build incl. tests
succeed then.
Cheers,
Jörg
Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC2).
>
> Tag name:
>R
Hi Rob,
Rob Tompkins wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain, I
> would like to attempt working with some short term goals. The hope here is
> to think about questions along the lines of: "what can be done today/this
> week/this month,” with the go
Hello,
Given that the long term goals of commons-math are fairly uncertain, I would
like to attempt working with some short term goals. The hope here is to think
about questions along the lines of: "what can be done today/this week/this
month,” with the goal aiming at chipping away at what I’ll
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 01:49:22 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 16/09/2016 à 23:46, Gilles a écrit :
[X] -1 No, do not release it because ...
-1 due to the design concerns I mentioned in the RC1 thread.
FTR
Your observations relevant to the vote have been taken into
account for RC2.
Gilles
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 10:53:42 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 17/09/2016 à 04:26, Gilles a écrit :
Sorry, but none of them warrant a -1.
You are free to completely ignore my feedback as you currently do,
Please don't pretend that I do that.
Ignore means not replying.
I never ignored any feed
Le 16/09/2016 à 00:49, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> I'd like to start a release for [codec]. If you want to review the code
> now, please do so.
I tried to build the site but the BOM in changes.xml crashed the changes
plugin, and clirr is unable to run for some reason. The changes look good.
Emmanuel
Le 17/09/2016 à 04:26, Gilles a écrit :
> Sorry, but none of them warrant a -1.
You are free to completely ignore my feedback as you currently do, but
you can't claim that my concerns doesn't warrant a -1. The API is
immature and should not be released as 1.0. And if you are not listening
don't c
+1
Отправлено с iPhone
> 17 сент. 2016 г., в 6:10, Dave Brosius написал(а):
>
> +1
>
>
>> On 09/16/2016 05:46 PM, Gilles wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC2).
>>
>> Tag name:
>> RNG_1_0_RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v
16 matches
Mail list logo
