+1
On 09/16/2016 05:46 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC2).
Tag name:
RNG_1_0_RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')
Tag URL:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=commit;h=412ffb37932c45d7664eb83b
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 01:49:22 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 16/09/2016 à 23:46, Gilles a écrit :
[X] -1 No, do not release it because ...
-1 due to the design concerns I mentioned in the RC1 thread.
Sorry, but none of them warrant a -1.
Emmanuel Bourg
(there is a typo on the main page j
Hi.
On Sat, 17 Sep 2016 01:38:16 +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
Le 15/09/2016 à 16:37, Gilles a écrit :
I don't understand "motivations for the API".
I just mean a short introduction to the component, something
explaining
why it exists, its usefulness (performance, randomness quality), the
i
Le 16/09/2016 à 23:46, Gilles a écrit :
> [X] -1 No, do not release it because ...
-1 due to the design concerns I mentioned in the RC1 thread.
Emmanuel Bourg
(there is a typo on the main page java.lang.Random -> java.util.Random)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Le 15/09/2016 à 16:37, Gilles a écrit :
> I don't understand "motivations for the API".
I just mean a short introduction to the component, something explaining
why it exists, its usefulness (performance, randomness quality), the
implementations supported, etc.
> I won't do that.
> It was alread
Hi.
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons RNG 1.0 (from RC2).
Tag name:
RNG_1_0_RC2 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v')
Tag URL:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=commons-rng.git;a=commit;h=412ffb37932c45d7664eb83bd540f81d27a02b84
Commit ID the tag poin
Oh, wait, this is NOT a tag. Nevermind.
Gary
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 9:40 AM, Gary Gregory
wrote:
> -1 Do NOT remove tags that we voted on. It does not matter if the VOTE
> passed or failed. This allows anyone to examine the sources that the VOTE
> thread used and see for themselves what happen
-1 Do NOT remove tags that we voted on. It does not matter if the VOTE
passed or failed. This allows anyone to examine the sources that the VOTE
thread used and see for themselves what happened.
Thank you,
Gary
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:28 AM, wrote:
> Author: stain
> Date: Fri Sep 16 10:28:18
The below vote is CANCELLED. Thanks to all who helped review.
I'll improve the build to match better our minimum requirement of Java
6 and try again.
On 14 September 2016 at 16:45, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 (from RC2)
>
>
> SVN tag
OK, let's remove the src/site japicmp trigger and activate it manually
with -Pjapicmp only during release time - then the build should work
in Java 6 even if you try to build the site.
As this has just received 1 vote (2 with mine) I'll cancel the RC and
also add a BUILDING.txt.
On 15 September
On 2016-09-16, Gilles wrote:
> Is the site a valid reason?
to cancel a release? IMHO no.
Stefan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 09:20:14 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Gilles
wrote:
On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:41:01 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote:
"I'd rather not redo the release steps just for files that are
meaningful only when browsing the code repository mirror at
Github."
On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 9:21 PM, Ralph Goers wrote:
> I migrated Log4j to the CMS because Infra basically said it was the only
> supported way to publish an ASF web site. Has that changed?
That's my understanding, yes. OTOH, I'm not Infra.
Jochen
--
The next time you hear: "Don't reinvent th
13 matches
Mail list logo
