Re: [RDF] jena, rdf4j, json-ld integrations

On 15 September 2016 at 18:34, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > On 15 Sep 2016 5:11 a.m., "Peter Ansell" wrote: >> One of the original goals was to help with migration and >> interoperability so if it doesn't then things would need to be >> reworked on the Commons RDF side to support that. > > I woul

[codec] ready for a release

I'd like to start a release for [codec]. If you want to review the code now, please do so. Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition

Re: Move Site from CMS to Git

CMS uses SVN but is not the same thing. I think there are 3 ways to publish a site: svnpubsub - i.e. generate and upload site to the appropriate SVN tree and it will automatically get published This is what Commons uses currently CMS + svnpubsub: This uses CMS to maintain the site; after edittin

Re: Move Site from CMS to Git

I migrated Log4j to the CMS because Infra basically said it was the only supported way to publish an ASF web site. Has that changed? Is there a new, documented way to use git for that? Ralph > On Sep 15, 2016, at 2:42 AM, Jochen Wiedmann > wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Stian

Re: [RNG] About RNG-6 (Was: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0)

After scanning this, I am wondering if a smoother path to 1.0 would be really be through a beta or alpha release. The code is all there, any one can look at it. The advantage of a beta release is that it gets pushed out as a ANNOUNCE email and might get more notice. YMMV. Gary On Thu, Sep 15, 20

Re: [RNG] About RNG-6 (Was: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0)

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 7:37 AM, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > Moving to another thread, as your comments do not belong in > a release vote. > > Many of them could lead to interesting discussions that should > (and could) have happened earlier. > > Indeed, for the record, see > https://issues.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

I would suggest to use a build toolchain (which has been around forever) for the actual compilation and maybe raise the minimum requirement for Maven to be something more modern. So you use a JDK 7+ to drive the build process but can use a JDK 6 to actually compile the jars. We used that setup in

Re: [LANG] Add alphabet conversion API

There is already creep of text-like code in [lang] like org.apache.commons.lang3.text.WordUtils. I'd rather see a [text] component come alive. Gary On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:22 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Eyal, > > Commons Text started as an experiment but we never pushed out a release.

Re: [ALL] Valid reasons for blocking a release? (Was: [REMINDER][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0)

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 4:02 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:41:01 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: > >> "I'd rather not redo the release steps just for files that are >> meaningful only when browsing the code repository mirror at >> Github." >> >> I know our release process is a pain, so ma

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 2:55 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I've raised https://github.com/siom79/japicmp/issues/148 to ask if the > japicmp report can be skipped if the "mvn package" phase has not been > run. > > > If someone does 'mvn site', would it not be typically from the trunk > or after

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 1:34 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > I wonder if japicmp needs > > mvn clean package site > That does not work with Java 6, an annoyance since the requirements for this component is Java 6: [ERROR] Failed to execute goal org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-site-plugin:3.4:si

Re: [REMINDER][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

On 15 Sep 2016 12:35 p.m., "Gilles" wrote: >> If the front page is fixed in git, then I'll change to a +1. > > What do you mean by "front page"? That would be src/site/index.xml or so - just to see that it is ready to be deployed (independent of the tag/RC).

[RNG] About RNG-6 (Was: [VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0)

Hi. Moving to another thread, as your comments do not belong in a release vote. Many of them could lead to interesting discussions that should (and could) have happened earlier. Indeed, for the record, see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RNG-6 and the numerous posts which I sent to this

Re: [RDF] adaptation methods in RDFTermFactory

Yeah, I mean as a generic asFoo() type method, particularly in an interface. I also suggest having generic bounds to suggest what types are possible. It really depends on if the casting is useful to a user of the library or a developer of the library. On 14 September 2016 at 22:23, Stian Soiland-R

Re: [CANCEL][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

Hi Gilles, Gilles wrote: > Hi. > > I'll prepare RC2 in order to fix the following minor glitches: please have also a look at Emmanuel's comments first ... Cheers, Jörg > > * Name of the component "Commons Rng" -> "Apache Commons RNG". > Reported by Gary Gregory. > * Add (Github) th

[CANCEL][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

Hi. I'll prepare RC2 in order to fix the following minor glitches: * Name of the component "Commons Rng" -> "Apache Commons RNG". Reported by Gary Gregory. * Add (Github) the 2 files "README.md" and "CONTRIBUTING.md" to the distribution files (source and binaries). Reported by Stian S

Re: [ALL] Valid reasons for blocking a release?

On 2016-09-15, Gilles wrote: > On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:41:01 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: >> "I'd rather not redo the release steps just for files that are >> meaningful only when browsing the code repository mirror at >> Github." >> I know our release process is a pain, so maybe we should see if we

Re: [REMINDER][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0

On Thu, 15 Sep 2016 03:17:02 +0100, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: On 14 Sep 2016 3:32 p.m., "Gilles" wrote: The site can, and will be fixed, "live" (as it must be done anyway for the link to the Javadoc, see below). I think it's good we keep the practice of reviewing the website as part of an

Re: [LANG] Add alphabet conversion API

Hello Eyal, Commons Text started as an experiment but we never pushed out a release. If there is interest again, we can get things started again. Regards, Benedikt Eyal Allweil schrieb am Do., 15. Sep. 2016 um 12:34 Uhr: > Hi Benedict, Bruno - > I can see that commons-text might be a better ho

[ALL] Valid reasons for blocking a release? (Was: [REMINDER][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Rng 1.0)

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016 07:41:01 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: "I'd rather not redo the release steps just for files that are meaningful only when browsing the code repository mirror at Github." I know our release process is a pain, so maybe we should see if we can improve it. This needs a separate t

[RDF] Rename RDFTermFactory to RDFFactory / RDF?

Hi, Should we rename RDFTermFactory to RDFFactory? Or just RDF? Someone suggested that some time ago. The reason is that it does quite more than creating RDFTerms, e.g. creating triples, graphs and datasets. This might make it more obvious why its instances would also include 'adaptation' metho

[RDF] Include RDFParserBuilder in 0.3.0?

[[ Cross-posting - let's try to reply to dev@commons. ]] I guess this is mainly of interest to Commons RDF folks - but there's some question baked in here on what to do with an experimental interface. Note that the next incubator release of Commons RDF is "0.3.0" - so we could still 'break' for a

Re: [LANG] Add alphabet conversion API

Hi Benedict, Bruno - I can see that commons-text might be a better home for this functionality than commons-lang. But is the project still active? There haven't been any commits in the past year, and there seem to be no maven binaries available (http://stackoverflow.com/questions/36374510/maven-

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

I tested successfully with: docker run -v $(pwd):/usr/src/app -v /usr/src/app/target -w /usr/src/app -it maven:3-jdk-7 mvn verify docker run -v $(pwd):/usr/src/app -v /usr/src/app/target -w /usr/src/app -it maven:3-jdk-8 mvn verify (both of which use Apache Maven 3.3.9) BTW: maven:3-jdk-9

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

I've raised https://github.com/siom79/japicmp/issues/148 to ask if the japicmp report can be skipped if the "mvn package" phase has not been run. If someone does 'mvn site', would it not be typically from the trunk or after running 'mvn package'? For now, do you think it's enough to add the requ

Re: Move Site from CMS to Git

On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:23 AM, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote: > Commons is special in that we have many components within the same website, > but update them separately and generally only at release time. > > With git you would always need to check out all of the commons site, e.g. > lots of javado

Re: Move Site from CMS to Git

Commons is special in that we have many components within the same website, but update them separately and generally only at release time. With git you would always need to check out all of the commons site, e.g. lots of javadoc for each of the components. We might have to fix the site deploy so i

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

I wonder if japicmp needs mvn clean package site So that it will have a JAR to compare. Did that work with you? I'll have a look at the other errors. On 15 Sep 2016 6:49 a.m., "Gary Gregory" wrote: > From the src zip: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > > -1 because I cannot run 'mvn clean site' not matter

Re: [RDF] jena, rdf4j, json-ld integrations

On 15 Sep 2016 5:11 a.m., "Peter Ansell" wrote: > One of the original goals was to help with migration and > interoperability so if it doesn't then things would need to be > reworked on the Commons RDF side to support that. I would hope it does that now :-) > The main dependencies that are share

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

This is not a site nit. I cannot build it at all. How do you build it? Gary On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 12:54 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > I don't think the site build should block a release. As you like to put it: > RERO. Let's fix it in 1.9.4. > > Benedikt > > Gary Gregory schrieb am Do., 15. Se

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.3 RC2

I don't think the site build should block a release. As you like to put it: RERO. Let's fix it in 1.9.4. Benedikt Gary Gregory schrieb am Do., 15. Sep. 2016 um 07:49 Uhr: > From the src zip: MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. > > -1 because I cannot run 'mvn clean site' not matter what version of Java I > use: