Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

2016-08-13 Thread Gary Gregory
I would support another RC that clearly documents what the requirements are for different parts of the build. Then IMO we should switch trunk to Java 7. Gary On Aug 13, 2016 12:37 PM, "Oliver Heger" wrote: > > > Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory: > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM,

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

2016-08-13 Thread Charles Honton
Either ’a’ or ‘b’. I’m all for anything that makes releasing easier. +1 for requiring java 1.7 or 1.8 to build site +1 (in general) for requiring java 1.7 or 1.8 to build artifacts, even if project is targeted to 1.6, 1.5, etc. chas > On Aug 13, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Oliver Heger > wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.1 based on RC3

2016-08-13 Thread Oliver Heger
Am 12.08.2016 um 20:11 schrieb Gary Gregory: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Dennis Kieselhorst > wrote: > >> Am 12.08.2016 um 01:18 schrieb Gary Gregory: >>> -1 >>> >>> From src zip: ASC, MD5, SHA1 OK. >>> >>> Building with: >>> >>> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf96