Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

2016-07-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
+1 binding. Kristian 2016-07-05 21:21 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger : > Because of the failing test I also feel a bit uneasy, but nevertheless I > am +1: It is only a test class, the problem occurs only in a specific > setup, it is already fixed in trunk, and the release is really overdue. > > Thanks >

Re: [lang] LANG-1247: FastDatePrinter generates Date objects wastefully closes #168

2016-07-05 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
2016-07-05 22:44 GMT+02:00 : > LANG-1247: FastDatePrinter generates Date objects wastefully > closes #168 > public StringBuffer format(final long millis, final StringBuffer buf) { > -return format(new Date(millis), buf); > +final Calendar c = newCalendar(); > +c.setTim

Jenkins build is back to stable : Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 » Apache Commons Crypto #94

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to stable : Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 #94

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #131

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 #131

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #130

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- Started by user sebb Finished: ABORTED

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #129

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- Started by user sebb Finished: ABORTED

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #128

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 169 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- build-helper-maven-plugin:1.10:parse-version (parse-version) @ commons-crypto --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-re

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #128

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 182 lines...] [INFO] configuring report plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin:2.9 [INFO] configuring report plugin

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #127

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 169 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- build-helper-maven-plugin:1.10:parse-version (parse-version) @ commons-crypto --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-re

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #127

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 182 lines...] [INFO] configuring report plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin:2.9 [INFO] configuring report plugin

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #126

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 169 lines...] [INFO] [INFO] --- build-helper-maven-plugin:1.10:parse-version (parse-version) @ commons-crypto --- [INFO] [INFO] --- maven-re

Build failed in Jenkins: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #126

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See -- [...truncated 182 lines...] [INFO] configuring report plugin org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-project-info-reports-plugin:2.9 [INFO] configuring report plugin

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 » Apache Commons Crypto #93

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.8 #93

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 #125

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons-CRYPTO-JDK1.7 » Apache Commons Crypto #125

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[Crypto] document clearly no Windows OS for 1.0

2016-07-05 Thread Gary Gregory
... and whatever OS is actually supported, tested during the RC, and built with Jenkins. Gary (phone, typos)

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

2016-07-05 Thread Oliver Heger
Because of the failing test I also feel a bit uneasy, but nevertheless I am +1: It is only a test class, the problem occurs only in a specific setup, it is already fixed in trunk, and the release is really overdue. Thanks Oliver Am 05.07.2016 um 11:16 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > This vote is still

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

2016-07-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Andrey Loskutov wrote: > Jörg, > Can you elaborate what do you mean by "BCEL 6.0 fails badly on JDK 1.9"? %< joehni@floh ~/tmp/download/bcel-6.0-src $ mvn -v Apache Maven 3.3.9 (bb52d8502b132ec0a5a3f4c09453c07478323dc5; 2015-11-10T17:41:4

Jenkins build is back to stable : Commons-Codec » Apache Commons Codec #7

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to stable : Commons-Codec #7

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

2016-07-05 Thread Andrey Loskutov
Jörg, Can you elaborate what do you mean by "BCEL 6.0 fails badly on JDK 1.9"? Are there open tickets for that? Beside this, I don't +1 vote this time due the lack of time for testing. Previous RC was good for FindBugs, so I hope that the last minute changes didn't broke anything we use, and f

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons-Codec » Apache Commons Codec #6

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons-Codec #6

2016-07-05 Thread Apache Jenkins Server
See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

2016-07-05 Thread Gary Gregory
Well, all of my tests are OK. Building from src zip is OK MD5, SHA1, ASC OK. Builds fine with Maven 3.4.0-SNAPSHOT and Java 7 on Windows 7 64 bit. It's a shame that it does not build on Oliver's Windows 10 (and probably other set ups) due to the bug in JDKGenericDumpTestCase *I* introduced (whic

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

2016-07-05 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Benedikt, since BCEL is highly dependent on the JDK, I will not oppose a release this time, because BCEL 6.0 fails badly on JDK 1.9. We'll have to address this with a later release. However, with the rest of my compiler zoo >= 1.7 I can build and run all tests from source without problems.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7

2016-07-05 Thread Benedikt Ritter
This vote is still pending and nobody has voted so far. Please review this RC and cast your votes! Thank you! Benedikt Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Sa., 2. Juli 2016 um 20:52 Uhr: > Hi, > > I'd like to release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC7. Changes compared > to RC6 are: > > - restored bin

Re: svn commit: r1751160 - /commons/trunks-proper/

2016-07-05 Thread Benedikt Ritter
sebb schrieb am Mo., 4. Juli 2016 um 12:35 Uhr: > Is there a document describing the steps for moving a component to dormant? > > If so, we also need to add updating projects.a.o to remove / update > any DOAP URLs > I don't think we have a documentation for that. We should start on documenting t

Re: [CRYPTO] is the ConfigurationKeys class needed?

2016-07-05 Thread sebb
On 5 July 2016 at 07:32, Ke, Xianda wrote: > +1 > Long long names is burden for user. > > What's more, following two constants are just for implementation. > It does not make sense to mix these with the configuration keys. > In fact, user can configure a buffer size or algorithm, but he cannot >