Re: [MATH] what a commons-TLP split could look like

Hi Eric and Gilles, Gilles wrote: [snip] > Here is a list of usage count of CM packages (Github search[1]): > o.a.c.math3.analysis 2 > o.a.c.math3.distribution 39 > o.a.c.math3.exception 3 > o.a.c.math3.linear 10 > o.a.c.math3.primes1 > o.a.c.math3.random

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6

Hi Sebb, sebb wrote: > On 21 June 2016 at 00:14, Mark Roberts wrote: >> Sorry - I'm replying to my own post. Is there any chance that there is a >> revision point in the active tree that corresponds exactly to RC6 but >> without the path changes? I could do some testing on that. > > I don't t

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6

Doubt it, but you could certainly 'shade ' the plugin with maven to convert all references from the original path to the path you're expecting. On 06/20/2016 07:14 PM, Mark Roberts wrote: Sorry - I'm replying to my own post. Is there any

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6

On 21 June 2016 at 00:14, Mark Roberts wrote: > Sorry - I'm replying to my own post. Is there any chance that there is a > revision point in the active tree that corresponds exactly to RC6 but without > the path changes? I could do some testing on that. I don't think so; there were some subse

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6

Sorry - I'm replying to my own post. Is there any chance that there is a revision point in the active tree that corresponds exactly to RC6 but without the path changes? I could do some testing on that. Probably too much to hope for. Thanks, Mark > -Original Message- > From: Mark Robe

RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6

Well I was clearly confused about this release. It has reverted back to the old class hierarchy in the name of binary compatibility. I can see now that that was the intention and it makes sense. However, I cannot test it (and hence vote up or down) as I am certainly not going to edit all my s

Re: [MATH] what a commons-TLP split could look like

Hi. On Mon, 20 Jun 2016 11:31:23 +0200, Eric Barnhill wrote: Here's a proposed draft for how o.a.c.m might be split into a commons component, and more sophisticated spin-out components, around which we might develop a new Math TLP or incubator project in which components of the project that fi

Re: [JCS] Failing Tests in JCS Core

JUnit has Assume which can allow to keep the test, wouldn't it be better? Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau | Blog | Old Wordpress Blog | Github | LinkedIn <

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-email » Apache Commons Email #2

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-email #2

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Compress 1.12 based on RC2

Build works fine with Java 1.6 and 1.8 on Windows 10. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Oliver Am 18.06.2016 um 18:12 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > Hi all > > as promised I've cut a RC for Compress 1.12. > > The Release Candidate is available for review at: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/de

Jenkins build is back to normal : commons-net #9

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : commons-net » Apache Commons Net #9

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is back to normal : commons-imaging #10

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[GitHub] commons-cli pull request #5: Skipping empty tests

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-cli/pull/5 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is e

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6

Still +1 (for the previous state, if binary isn't changed compared with the previous RC build). Am 20. Juni 2016 21:36:56 MESZ, schrieb Benedikt Ritter : >Hi, > >after some build related problems with RC5, I'd like to call a vote to >release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6. The only changes

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6

Hi, after some build related problems with RC5, I'd like to call a vote to release Apache Commons BCEL 6.0 based on RC6. The only changes compared to RC5 is a fix in the source assembly: It now includes all files necessary to run a clean build. BCEL 6.0 RC6 is available for review here: https:/

Re: [JCS] Failing Tests in JCS Core

Thomas Vandahl schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2016 um 21:21 Uhr: > On 19.06.16 10:47, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hi, > > > > we have failing tests on Jenkins for JCS [1]. Does anybody know what > caused > > this? > > > > Regards, > > Benedikt > > > > [1] > > > https://builds.apache.org/view/Apache%20Co

Re: [JCS] Failing Tests in JCS Core

On 19.06.16 10:47, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hi, > > we have failing tests on Jenkins for JCS [1]. Does anybody know what caused > this? > > Regards, > Benedikt > > [1] > https://builds.apache.org/view/Apache%20Commons/job/commons-jcs/159/org.apache.commons$commons-jcs-core/console > The differ

Jenkins build became unstable: commons-jcs #161

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build became unstable: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #161

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Build failed in Jenkins: commons-imaging #9

See Changes: [britter] This important comment should be part of the API docs. [britter] Drop commented out code [britter] Fix broken site build - add profile for deactivating doclint and update to latest JavaNCSS plugin version ---

Re: [ALL] Need help with contributing for first time

Hi, you are welcome to contribute! :-) Here's a list of all the Commons bug trackers in Jira: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/BrowseProjects.jspa#10260 I am not sure what you are interested in, you mentioned Commons-Lang, so something generic? Here are some ideas: https://issues.apache

Re: [crypto] Logging dependency

Hello, Sun, Dapeng schrieb am Mo., 20. Juni 2016 um 04:54 Uhr: > >>Do I understand correctly that Crypto should fall back to JCE if native > code could not be loaded? > > Yes, if "ENABLE_FALLBACK_ON_NATIVE_FAILED" is true(by default), it would > fall back to JCE > Sounds like a pretty clear pro

Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

On 20 June 2016 at 16:48, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > > >> -Original Message- >> From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] >> Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 14:04 >> To: Commons Developers List ; >> dennis.hamil...@acm.org >> Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces >> sup

RE: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces supposed to be implemented or just used?

> -Original Message- > From: sebb [mailto:seb...@gmail.com] > Sent: Sunday, June 19, 2016 14:04 > To: Commons Developers List ; > dennis.hamil...@acm.org > Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Defining the public API; are its interfaces > supposed to be implemented or just used? > > On 19 June 2016 at

[ALL] Need help with contributing for first time

Hello Everyone, I am new to apache commons and want to contribute to the library. I tried to search for issues in commons-lang but all the issues were quite old. I need help on which project to contribute or what task to take. I am fairly comfortable with Java, but I don't have much Open Sour

Re: apache, commons, math

> On Jun 19, 2016, at 3:13 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > > Hi Ralph, > > Ralph Goers wrote: > > >> Once there are enough active >> committers then I would think they would become Math TLP PMC members when >> it is appropriate. > > > To me this means to keep CM alive as it is (multi-project or

Re: [MATH] what a commons-TLP split could look like

After reading more about the proposed changes, I am now comfortable with dividing the library into separate components. However, I have two concerns. First, a package or class that passes unit tests should not be abandoned or depricated just because there is no one to support it. It should only be

Re: [MATH] what a commons-TLP split could look like

Like I said, my untrained eye. Sounds like it should definitely be kept. Eric On Mon, Jun 20, 2016 at 11:47 AM, sebb wrote: > On 20 June 2016 at 10:31, Eric Barnhill wrote: > > Here's a proposed draft for how o.a.c.m might be split into a commons > > component, and more sophisticated spin-out

Re: [MATH] what a commons-TLP split could look like

On 20 June 2016 at 10:31, Eric Barnhill wrote: > Here's a proposed draft for how o.a.c.m might be split into a commons > component, and more sophisticated spin-out components, around which we > might develop a new Math TLP or incubator project in which components of > the project that find backers

[MATH] what a commons-TLP split could look like

Here's a proposed draft for how o.a.c.m might be split into a commons component, and more sophisticated spin-out components, around which we might develop a new Math TLP or incubator project in which components of the project that find backers continue on, and those that do not are frozen at their