Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Gilles, Thanks for links. I just read that (long-winded) thread and I see no consensus that "Commons project is not being interested in hosting those components". It may be that incubation is a good thing for Commons Math, but it doesn't seem valid to say that incubation is necessary because CM

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 10:39:38 -0700, Gary Gregory wrote: Do we need some kind of ranked vote with choices like: Where should Commons Math go (in alpha order)? - Commons Attic - Incubator then TLP - Incubator then Commons Math - Stay put - TLP - Create components (with code extracted from the

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

On Fri, 17 Jun 2016 08:51:36 -0700, Ted Dunning wrote: Excuse me? See inline. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Gilles wrote: Hi all. On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:01:13 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: I thought this had been made clear. Several months Commons voted to make Math a TLP. But shortl

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

> On Jun 17, 2016, at 12:11 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > > I don't see the need for a consensus. If some people want to write an > incubator proposal, they can write it. If they can sell it to the > incubator, they have a podling. Meanwhile, the code remains Apache > Licensed, and anyone who wa

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

I don't see the need for a consensus. If some people want to write an incubator proposal, they can write it. If they can sell it to the incubator, they have a podling. Meanwhile, the code remains Apache Licensed, and anyone who wants to commit things to it back here can do that. Eventually, there w

RE: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

Brief side-comments from a lurker. It appears that any kind of [VOTE] is premature. There needs to be a better way to find consensus, including more preparatory discussion and determination of an actionable direction. > -Original Message- > From: Gary Gregory [mailto:garydgreg...@gmail

RE: [BCEL] Release Candidate on Thursday

I think sebb already took care of these two issues. > -Original Message- > From: Benedikt Ritter [mailto:benerit...@gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, June 17, 2016 9:50 AM > To: Commons Developers List > Subject: Re: [BCEL] Release Candidate on Thursday > > Hello Mark, > > Mark Roberts schrieb

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

Do we need some kind of ranked vote with choices like: Where should Commons Math go (in alpha order)? - Commons Attic - Incubator then TLP - Incubator then Commons Math - Stay put - TLP ? On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 10:31 AM, James Carman wrote: > We should probably tally the votes at this point,

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

We should probably tally the votes at this point, but it is pretty clear that there is no consensus, unfortunately. I honestly have no idea what to do at this point. I have limited connectivity today. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 12:51 PM Benedikt Ritter wrote: > James Carman schrieb am Sa., 11. Jun

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Math to TLP (again)...

James Carman schrieb am Sa., 11. Juni 2016 um 05:47 Uhr: > Since it has been suggested that the previously passing vote should be > voided, I propose we vote again to move Commons Math to a TLP: > > +1 - Yes, move Commons Math to a TLP > -1 - No, do not move Commons Math to a TLP > > The vote wil

Re: [BCEL] Release Candidate on Thursday

Hello Mark, Mark Roberts schrieb am Di., 14. Juni 2016 um 18:31 Uhr: > People, please look at the data base before you post. There has been a > fix available since August of last year. (Shortly before the last effort > to produce a 6.0 pooped out.) There is also a test case that demonstrate

Jenkins build is back to normal : commons-bcel #12

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [crypto] Logging dependency

Hello Dapeng, Sun, Dapeng schrieb am Mi., 15. Juni 2016 um 11:22 Uhr: > Thank all for your input! > > I will try to remove the log dependence. > > About the logging of native library failure, users of CRYPTO could get the > information about whether native is enabled or native failure reason fro

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Excuse me? See inline. On Fri, Jun 17, 2016 at 7:50 AM, Gilles wrote: > Hi all. > > On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:01:13 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: > >> I thought this had been made clear. Several months Commons voted to >> make Math a TLP. But shortly after that most of the people involved >> with C

Re: [ALL] Volunteers for a Math IPMC?

Hi all. On Tue, 14 Jun 2016 11:01:13 -0700, Ralph Goers wrote: I thought this had been made clear. Several months Commons voted to make Math a TLP. But shortly after that most of the people involved with Commons Math felt that a TLP at the ASF would not work for them, so they forked the project

[RESULT][VOTE] Move Apache Commons Primitives to dormant

Hello, This vote passes: Stian Soiland-Ryes: +1 (binding) Matt Sticker: +1 (non-binding) Kristian Rosenvold: +1 (binding) Bernd Eckenfels: +1 (binding) Benedikt Ritter +1 (binding) Jörg Schaible: +1 (binding) Jochen Wiedmann: +1 (binding) I'll move Primitives to dormant and send an announcement

[MATH] Adjusting Code written for Math Commons 2.0 to the newest Version of Math Commons

Hello, I recently wrote my question to this email adress, but I wasn't subscribed to the developer list yet. In the answer I got I was told that my question was "off-topic for the developer list". I assume this was a mistake, since my question is definitely about developing and not just using math