Re: Binary compatibility report

How would that be different from Clirr? Gary Gregory schrieb am So., 5. Juni 2016 um 03:06: > I would be neat to turn this into a Maven plugin that generates a report as > part of the generated site. > > Gary > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Ponomarenko Andrey < > andrewponomare...@yandex.ru>

[all] Javadoc

I think it would be nice to have a link to a Javadoc site for ALL components in one lump. This would go on the main page. Thoughts? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Sec

Re: Binary compatibility report

I would be neat to turn this into a Maven plugin that generates a report as part of the generated site. Gary On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:19 AM, Ponomarenko Andrey < andrewponomare...@yandex.ru> wrote: > Hello, > > I've just prepared the report on backward compatibility for the Commons IO > library

Re: Apache Code of Conduct

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 5:06 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Niall Pemberton < > niall.pember...@gmail.com > > > > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here: > > > http://www

Re: Apache Code of Conduct

On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 12:56 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Niall Pemberton > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here: > > http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html > > > > I think we should include a link to it on the Commons Si

Re: Apache Code of Conduct

On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 4:53 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > Hi, > > Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here: > http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html > > I think we should include a link to it on the Commons Site - does anyone > object to that? > No objection, could it go under "GEN

Apache Code of Conduct

Hi, Apache has a "Code of Conduct" here: http://www.apache.org/foundation/policies/conduct.html I think we should include a link to it on the Commons Site - does anyone object to that? Thanks Niall

Binary compatibility report

Hello, I've just prepared the report on backward compatibility for the Commons IO library (BC — binary compatibility, SC — source compatibility): http://abi-laboratory.pro/java/tracker/timeline/commons-io/ The report is generated daily by the japi-compliance-checker and japi-tracker tools: ht

Re: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in commons?

I'll start a separate thread for VFS classification as it has a bit more dependencies.. :) On 2 June 2016 at 20:58, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > If you know how so get this right for VFS, go for it! > > Stian Soiland-Reyes schrieb am Do., 2. Juni 2016 um > 16:35: > >> Thanks! It's already on https:/

Re: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in commons?

If you are ready to do the Crypto release now, then let's just prepare that ECCN registration email for Commons Crypto alone, no need to wait. We should send it before we post a Release Candidate of Crypto (In theory before we submit the code to git! ;-/). I'll send it now. On 4 Jun 2016 11:35 a.m

Re: US Export classification & ECCN registration for encryption in commons?

Chen, Haifeng schrieb am Fr., 3. Juni 2016 um 08:20 Uhr: > Thanks Stian, Dapeng and folks! > > For Commons Crypto, do we still have to wait for other process to finish > or we now can go forward with the first release process? > I don't see any other blockers. Benedikt > > Regards, > Haifeng