On 15 April 2016 at 02:19, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Sebb,
>
> I don't know why you think I could distinguish the following possible
> behaviors of prior RMs with a reasonable level of effort:
As I have already said, I don't use the plugin.
However I have followed release votes and AFAICR the fin
Thanks Benedikt!
My JIRA username is: jerrychenhf
Regards,
Haifeng
-Original Message-
From: Gangumalla, Uma [mailto:uma.ganguma...@intel.com]
Sent: Friday, April 15, 2016 3:40 AM
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [CRYPTO] Git repository requested
Hi Benedikt,
Here is my usern
Sebb,
I don't know why you think I could distinguish the following possible
behaviors of prior RMs with a reasonable level of effort:
1: didn't use the maven-release-plugin
2: did use the maven-release-plugin and then used svn mvn to rename
the tag it created
3: did use the maven-release-plugin,
On 14 April 2016 at 16:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 13247)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://reposito
On 15 April 2016 at 01:27, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:47 PM, sebb wrote:
>> On 14 April 2016 at 14:11, Benson Margulies wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Benson Margulies
>>> wrote:
The instructions offer two approaches as equivalent: manual tagging
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 5:47 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 14 April 2016 at 14:11, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>> The instructions offer two approaches as equivalent: manual tagging
>>> and pom-editing, and the release plugin.
>>>
>>> If you ju
The CONTRIBUTING.md and README.md files are present in the tag, but
are missing from the source archive.
Since they are intended mainly for GitHub - and they are generated -
that's not a blocker.
But it might make checking future releases easier if the files were included.
On 14 April 2016 at 22
On 14 April 2016 at 16:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 13247)
>
> Maven artifacts are here:
>
> https://reposito
On 14 April 2016 at 14:11, Benson Margulies wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>> The instructions offer two approaches as equivalent: manual tagging
>> and pom-editing, and the release plugin.
>>
>> If you just use the default options and hit a few times,
>> yo
+1
MD5, SHA1, ASC OK.
The site does not build on Java 7 and 8 due to a known issue with Maven
3.3.9 and maven-site-plugin and SLF4J (everybody should switch to Log4j 2
IMO).
Tested OK with: 'mvn clean site' on Maven 3.0.5 and:
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-
I don't see commons-math as legacy code. Just to look around my corner
of the world, ImageJ has a solid place in the biomedical imaging world
and commons-math is its workhorse. Second, I think Java is, or should be
anyway, a natural step outside of scientific computing environments like
Matlab
GitHub user mwiehl opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-io/pull/10
Fix a couple of typos in javadoc comments
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/mwiehl/commons-io trunk
Alternatively you can revie
Yep, Clirr report looks good. Thank you for addressing this so quickly! :-)
Gary
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> I've put up repaired doc.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
> > I think I know what happened to CLIRR.
> >
> > I'll push n
Hi Benedikt,
Here is my username: umamaheswararao
Regards,
Uma
On 4/14/16, 5:55 AM, "Benedikt Ritter" wrote:
>Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mi., 13. Apr. 2016 um
>11:09 Uhr:
>
>> Chen, Haifeng schrieb am Mi., 13. Apr. 2016 um
>> 05:18 Uhr:
>>
>>> The git repository for Apache Commons Crypto h
I've put up repaired doc.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:17 PM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> I think I know what happened to CLIRR.
>
> I'll push new staged doc soon.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Benson Margulies
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Th
I think I know what happened to CLIRR.
I'll push new staged doc soon.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Benson Margulies
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Gary Gregory
>> wrote:
>> > Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconf
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:23 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Gary Gregory
> wrote:
> > Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconfigured since it complains
> > about "Missing
> > a Javadoc comment." on a private method. That seems a bit much IMO.
>
> presumably that
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 12:04 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconfigured since it complains
> about "Missing
> a Javadoc comment." on a private method. That seems a bit much IMO.
presumably that's not something new that need to be fixed for 2.5.
>
> Gary
>
> On Th
1. I copied the entire site, using the mirror -R command of lftp. I
guess I'll try harder after we sort out CLIRR.
2. Can you tell me how to fix the clirr report? I don't see any CLIRR
config in the pom that seems relevant to the problem at hand. The
clirr config in the parent pom does not consume
Hm, we might also have Checkstyle misconfigured since it complains
about "Missing
a Javadoc comment." on a private method. That seems a bit much IMO.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials ar
Did you did not copy the whole site? Checkstyle links are broken.
For example on page
http://people.apache.org/~bimargulies/commons-io-2.5-RC4/checkstyle.html
the link to line 313 is broken:
http://people.apache.org/~bimargulies/commons-io-2.5-RC4/xref/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/io/output/Wr
The Clirr report is wrong, it should compare to 2.4. One cannot assess if
we broke BC from this report.
Gary
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Benson Margulies
wrote:
> Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
>
> Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
> https://dis
Commons-io 2.5 is offered for a release vote.
Commons-io 2.5 RC4 materials are available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/io/ (svn revision 13247)
Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1174/org/apach
I was under the impression that commons-math was the most frequently
contributed to subproject around here lately. Hard to call that legacy.
On 14 April 2016 at 08:45, Gilles wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I think that we could list quite a few things there:
> https://helpwanted.apache.org/
>
> But that wou
Hi.
I think that we could list quite a few things there:
https://helpwanted.apache.org/
But that would require that we know what we want in the first place.
Where is this project heading to?
Is this "legacy" code?
...
Regards,
Gilles
-
Plus this typo:
scm:svn:https://svn.apache.org/repos/infra/websites/production/commons/content/proper/commons-i/
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> When I ran 'mvn site' as instructed, I saw svn commits fly by. This
> suggests that the site is in fact staged to CMS, and
When I ran 'mvn site' as instructed, I saw svn commits fly by. This
suggests that the site is in fact staged to CMS, and the instructions
with respect to people or home are wrong. Can anyone shed any light?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 9:09 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
> The instructions offer two approaches as equivalent: manual tagging
> and pom-editing, and the release plugin.
>
> If you just use the default options and hit a few times,
> you'll get the tag: commons-io-2.5, NOT commons-io-2.5-RCx. The
The instructions offer two approaches as equivalent: manual tagging
and pom-editing, and the release plugin.
If you just use the default options and hit a few times,
you'll get the tag: commons-io-2.5, NOT commons-io-2.5-RCx. The manual
process will, on the other hand, name the tag commons-io-2.5
Benedikt Ritter schrieb am Mi., 13. Apr. 2016 um
11:09 Uhr:
> Chen, Haifeng schrieb am Mi., 13. Apr. 2016 um
> 05:18 Uhr:
>
>> The git repository for Apache Commons Crypto has been created. It is
>> locked so commits won't be accepted for now, will inform Daniel when we
>> want the lock lifted.
Mark Thomas schrieb am Do., 14. Apr. 2016 um 14:47 Uhr:
> On 14/04/2016 13:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
> > As predicted, a shortage. Can I have access to set fix versions? Or
> > can someone set it for IO-494 and IO-492 to 2.5?
>
> Added you to commons-developers.
>
You were faster than me :-)
On 14/04/2016 13:41, Benson Margulies wrote:
> As predicted, a shortage. Can I have access to set fix versions? Or
> can someone set it for IO-494 and IO-492 to 2.5?
Added you to commons-developers.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mai
As predicted, a shortage. Can I have access to set fix versions? Or
can someone set it for IO-494 and IO-492 to 2.5?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.ap
33 matches
Mail list logo
