Re: [math] RealMatrix power requires square matrix?

2016-01-20 Thread Ole Ersoy
Never mind on the below - I was thinking scalar operations ... Cheers, Ole On 01/20/2016 04:53 PM, Ole Ersoy wrote: Hi, The RealMatrix.power(p) (http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/RealMatrix.html#power%28int%29) says that it will throw a NON

[math] RealMatrix power requires square matrix?

2016-01-20 Thread Ole Ersoy
Hi, The RealMatrix.power(p) (http://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/org/apache/commons/math3/linear/RealMatrix.html#power%28int%29) says that it will throw a NON_SQUARE_MATRIX_EXCEPTION. Is this correct? Cheers, Ole

Re: [math] TLP next steps

2016-01-20 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2016-01-20 14:40 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz : > I think the next logical step is to determine who the members of the > new PMC and the new PMC chair will be. That information will need > to go in a Board resolution to actually form the new TLP. I suggest > that we start by asking for PMC volunteers a

[math] TLP next steps

2016-01-20 Thread Phil Steitz
I think the next logical step is to determine who the members of the new PMC and the new PMC chair will be. That information will need to go in a Board resolution to actually form the new TLP. I suggest that we start by asking for PMC volunteers among the Commons Committers. Are others OK with t

[RESULT] [VOTE] Form a separate TLP based on [math]

2016-01-20 Thread Phil Steitz
This VOTE has passed. In the tally below, Commons PMC members are marked with * +1 VOTES: Giles Sadowski * Norm Shapiro James Carman * Luc Maisonobe * Thomas Neidhart Jörg Schaible * Bill Barker * Henri Yandell Ate Douma Oliver Heger * Siegfried Göschl Phil Steitz * +0 VOTES: Bernd Eckenfels Ott

Re: [VOTE] Form a separate TLP based on [math]

2016-01-20 Thread Phil Steitz
On 1/16/16 8:18 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > The discussion has thus far been generally favorable. I would like > therefore to put the proposal to split [math] out into a separate > TLP to a VOTE. Assuming a favorable vote, we can discuss how to go > about doing it. Votes, please. All are welcome t