[VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC3

2015-11-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
Hi all, in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would like to start a vote to release Commons Collections 3.2.2 based on RC3. Notes: * the site will not be published, it just serves as a reference

Re: [POOL] Improving the borrow/return process with anonymous functions

2015-11-12 Thread Phil Steitz
On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Updating to Java 8 would be fine with me. You could write a [poll] email > thread the ML to gauge interest. > First, thanks for your interest in contributing, Cory! I am not sure this idea belongs in GOP itself. A GOP is not an applicati

Fwd: svn commit: r1714114 - /commons/proper/io/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt

2015-11-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I do not think one of the contributor's name need to be in ALL CAPS. Gary -- Forwarded message -- From: Date: Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 12:17 PM Subject: svn commit: r1714114 - /commons/proper/io/trunk/RELEASE-NOTES.txt To: comm...@commons.apache.org Author: krosenvold Date: Thu Nov

Re: [COLLECTIONS] Bad press on twitter following serialization issue

2015-11-12 Thread Gary Gregory
I think I saw a /. article about this yesterday... yikes. G On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 12:30 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > BTW Oracle issued a "Strange" Security alert: > > 2015-4852 was released on November 10th, 2015. > > This vulnerability, which involves the Apache Commons and Oracle

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/12/2015 07:14 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > Thomas Neidhart wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via >> java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would >> like to start a vote to release Commons Co

[CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 11/11/2015 05:27 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi all, > > in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via > java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would > like to start a vote to release Commons Collections 3.2.2 based on RC2. > > Notes: > >

Re: [POOL] Improving the borrow/return process with anonymous functions

2015-11-12 Thread Gary Gregory
Updating to Java 8 would be fine with me. You could write a [poll] email thread the ML to gauge interest. Gary On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Cory Klein wrote: > > The first hurdle here is that pool is not on Java 8. But this could be > done > > with other facilities like Runnable, Callable,

Re: [POOL] Improving the borrow/return process with anonymous functions

2015-11-12 Thread Cory Klein
> The first hurdle here is that pool is not on Java 8. But this could be done > with other facilities like Runnable, Callable, maybe even an executor. Although Callable wouldn't be as elegant as lambdas, it would definitely be possible. The consumer could define a Callable: class ResourceCallable

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Jörg Schaible
Hi Thomas, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Hi all, > > in order to provide a work-around for the known remote code exploit via > java de-serialization of malicious InvokerTransformer instances, I would > like to start a vote to release Commons Collections 3.2.2 based on RC2. > > Notes: > > * the sit

Re: [POOL] Improving the borrow/return process with anonymous functions

2015-11-12 Thread Gary Gregory
The first hurdle here is that pool is not on Java 8. But this could be done with other facilities like Runnable, Callable, maybe even an executor. Gary On Nov 12, 2015 9:47 AM, "Cory Klein" wrote: > First off, hello! My name is Cory Klein and this marks my first > interaction with this group. I'

[POOL] Improving the borrow/return process with anonymous functions

2015-11-12 Thread Cory Klein
First off, hello! My name is Cory Klein and this marks my first interaction with this group. I've read through the email guidelines and I think I have something productive to discuss here. In looking at GenericObjectPool I came across a process that I believe could be improved upon and I wanted to

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Gary Gregory
On Nov 11, 2015 11:45 PM, "Emmanuel Bourg" wrote: > > Le 12/11/2015 04:39, Phil Steitz a écrit : > > > That is frankly ridiculous. To -1 a release based on false positive report about files not included in the release is absurd. > > I agree with Phil. We are releasing code, not reports. Keep in

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread luc
Le 2015-11-12 10:18, Stefan Bodewig a écrit : On 2015-11-11, Thomas Neidhart wrote: Please review the release candidate and vote. +1 for the release. Luc +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apac

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2015-11-11, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > Please review the release candidate and vote. +1 Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Collections 3.2.2 Based on RC2

2015-11-12 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2015-11-12, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On Nov 11, 2015, at 12:05 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> -1 > That is frankly ridiculous. Couldn't agree more. Stefan - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For addition