Re: [Lang] Repository Write Access

On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 8:23 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > I've already created a ticket für INFRA a while ago [1], but so far nothing > has happend. > I guess we'd need to ping infra via the chat or somewhere else... -- Sergio Fernández Partner Technology Manager Redlink GmbH m: +43 6602747925

Re: [Lang] Repository Write Access

Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hi everybody, > > my memory serves me correctly ever Apache commiter should have write > access to commons repo? > > Just read in https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/112 Sergio > Fernández can not merge his pull request because he has no access. > > Out of cur

Re: [Lang] Repository Write Access

2015-11-03 2:06 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory : > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Pascal Schumacher < > pascalschumac...@gmx.net> > wrote: > > > Hi everybody, > > > > my memory serves me correctly ever Apache commiter should have write > > access to commons repo? > > > > To svn, yes, I'm not sure we got

Re: [Lang] Repository Write Access

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote: > Hi everybody, > > my memory serves me correctly ever Apache commiter should have write > access to commons repo? > To svn, yes, I'm not sure we got all git repos set up though. Gary > > Just read in https://github.com/apache/commons-la

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On 11/2/15 5:21 PM, Niall Pemberton wrote: > On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:35 AM, James Carman > wrote: > >> [x] -1 We should not do this because... >> >> For the record, I am also -1 to this code contribution, at least if done in >> this way. I would be happy to have this go through the incubator and

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 3:35 AM, James Carman wrote: > [x] -1 We should not do this because... > > For the record, I am also -1 to this code contribution, at least if done in > this way. I would be happy to have this go through the incubator and build > some community around it first so that we c

Re: [VFS] Jackrabbit

+1 Gary On Nov 2, 2015 2:23 PM, "Schalk Cronjé" wrote: > What I have noticed whilst playing around with JackRabbit is that the > jackrabbit-standalone.jar used as part of testing is not available under > the later 2.x releases. I think the VFS 2.1 release should probably stick > to the 1.6.5 rel

Re: [VFS] Jackrabbit

What I have noticed whilst playing around with JackRabbit is that the jackrabbit-standalone.jar used as part of testing is not available under the later 2.x releases. I think the VFS 2.1 release should probably stick to the 1.6.5 release. I would rather see VFS 2.1 get released, than waste time

[Lang] Repository Write Access

Hi everybody, my memory serves me correctly ever Apache commiter should have write access to commons repo? Just read in https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/112 Sergio Fernández can not merge his pull request because he has no access. Out of curiosity I merged the pull request locall

Re: [COMPRESS] Compress GUI?

Roger, I did go back and look at your previous email and had seen that you mentioned pivot. I started the initial workings of a project last night and started to read a little about pivot. I think I could pull it off given a few weeks time. Do you have any ideas of what you were thinking of fro

Re: [COMPRESS] Compress GUI?

Well, being that I'm the Apache Pivot PMC Chair, I was looking for "cross-fertilization" opportunities. So, my preferred GUI environment would be Apache Pivot. Of course, you're probably not familiar with it, but I think the resultant GUIs are easier to build and better-looking than Swing. An

Re: [3/4] [math] Fixed checkstyle warnings.

Le 2015-11-02 16:00, Gilles a écrit : Hi. On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:35:09 -, l...@apache.org wrote: Fixed checkstyle warnings. These warnings correspond to redundant modifiers (public, static, ...). It is not clear to me why they are redundant. This is explained here:

Re: [3/4] [math] Fixed checkstyle warnings.

Hi. On Mon, 02 Nov 2015 14:35:09 -, l...@apache.org wrote: Fixed checkstyle warnings. These warnings correspond to redundant modifiers (public, static, ...). It is not clear to me why they are redundant. They are identified by recent versions of checkstyle, in particular the one shipp

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

Le 31/10/2015 10:51, Uwe Barthel a écrit : > But, at these projects around 2 (reb4j) and 6 (pattern-builder) years no > activity. > > Naomi could be a new start for this idea. These inactive projects may also be a bad omen for Naomi, a sign that people prefer compact and unreadable expressions

Re: [DBCP] Plan for 2.2

On 01/11/2015 22:10, Phil Steitz wrote: > There are a few open issues that I would appreciate some feedback / > patches for so we can start rolling 2.2 RCs. > > DBCP-448: I am leaning toward the resolution that I suggested in > the ticket (basically have a config option that makes the properties

Re: Shameless plug: My new book is out.

On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 11:53 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-11-02 1:35 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory : > > > Hi All: > > > > I am proud to announce that my new book, "Java Persistence with > HIbernate, > > Second Edition", is out. I just received a box from the printer :-) > > > > You can get it on A