Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On 10/30/15 12:23 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > +1 for the Sandbox. Task 1: We need unit tests! +1 - best way to get into the code :) Phil > > Gary > > On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > >> This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for >> review using the gi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

+1 for the Sandbox. Task 1: We need unit tests! Gary On Thu, Oct 29, 2015 at 5:42 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for > review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes > from PMC members are binding. Assuming a posi

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On Fri, Oct 30, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 30/10/2015 13:03, Dave Brosius a écrit : > > > I certainly respect your opinion, but would ask that you reconsider, if > > possible. > > Well, this isn't a veto, if a majority wants to see this library in > Apache Commons then go ahead.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

Le 30/10/2015 13:03, Dave Brosius a écrit : > I certainly respect your opinion, but would ask that you reconsider, if > possible. Well, this isn't a veto, if a majority wants to see this library in Apache Commons then go ahead. But I don't think this is a wise move, and the project could perfectl

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On 10/30/15 8:40 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 30/10/2015 14:17, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 10/30/15 5:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >>> On 30/10/2015 00:42, Phil Steitz wrote: This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for review using the git commands below. All are welco

[COMPRESS] Compress GUI?

Hi all, I was just looking at the GUI for 7-Zip today (had to use it) and it struck me that using Apache Pivot and Commons Compress, we (someone, me perhaps, with some help) could come up with an Apache Commons Zip GUI that would be even better looking, and be a viable alternativ

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015, luc wrote: In fact, pull requests are really github-specific, and we don't have a complete integration between our Apache infrastructure and github for Commons Math. As an example, the requests are not directly forwarded to our mailing lists so we may miss them (and we alre

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On 30/10/2015 14:17, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 10/30/15 5:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: >> On 30/10/2015 00:42, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for >>> review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes >>> from PMC members are bin

Early Access builds for JDK 8u72 b05 , JDK 9 b88 and JDK 9 with Project Jigsaw build b86 are available on java.net

Hi Benedikt, Early Access build for JDK 8u72 b05 is available on java.net, summary of changes are listed here. Early Access build for JDK 9 b88

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On 10/30/15 4:06 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 30/10/2015 01:42, Phil Steitz a écrit : > >> [X] -1 We should not do this, because... > > I see more > Apache Commons as a ground for gathering libraries developed in other > Apache projects. I respect that view, but strongly disagree with it. I t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On 10/30/15 5:33 AM, Mark Thomas wrote: > On 30/10/2015 00:42, Phil Steitz wrote: >> This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for >> review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes >> from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will >> ex

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

On 30/10/2015 00:42, Phil Steitz wrote: > This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for > review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes > from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will > execute a software grant with the authors and us

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

Emmanuel, I understand where your opinions come from, and respect your arguments. I generally agree with your sentiments, that run of the mill 'github projects' should not be added to Apache willy-nilly. I think this contribution however is not the run-of-the-mill type, nor are the contributor

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

Emmanuel, I understand where your opinions come from, and respect your arguments. I generally agree with your sentiments, that run of the mill 'github projects' should not be added to Apache willy-nilly. I think this contribution however is not the run-of-the-mill type, nor are the contribut

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

> On Oct 30, 2015, at 1:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > Hello Phil, > > 2015-10-30 1:42 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz : > >> This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for >> review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes >> from PMC members are binding.

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

Le 30/10/2015 01:42, Phil Steitz a écrit : > [X] -1 We should not do this, because... Sorry I feel this is going too fast. I don't think Apache Commons should turn into a forge hosting any small project asking to join. I see more Apache Commons as a ground for gathering libraries developed in oth

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

Le 2015-10-30 10:58, Gilles a écrit : On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:20:00 +, Eric Barnhill wrote: On 30/10/15 02:15, Gilles wrote: There are some problems with the Javadoc (wrong "@return" comment). Not all local variables that are constant are declared "final". I am happy to give it all anothe

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:20:00 +, Eric Barnhill wrote: On 30/10/15 02:15, Gilles wrote: There are some problems with the Javadoc (wrong "@return" comment). Not all local variables that are constant are declared "final". I am happy to give it all another proof read. I take it the procedure i

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

On Fri, 30 Oct 2015 09:25:07 +, Eric Barnhill wrote: On 30/10/15 02:35, Gilles wrote: Unless I'm mistaken, there is no report on the project's bug-tracking system: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH Could you please open one? I see that I need someone to assign me the create

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

On 30/10/15 02:35, Gilles wrote: Unless I'm mistaken, there is no report on the project's bug-tracking system: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH Could you please open one? I see that I need someone to assign me the create issue project permission. Can I request that here? Er

Re: [MATH] ComplexUtils pull request; some future proposals

On 30/10/15 02:15, Gilles wrote: There are some problems with the Javadoc (wrong "@return" comment). Not all local variables that are constant are declared "final". I am happy to give it all another proof read. I take it the procedure is to fork the dedicated branch and then submit a pull r

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

Le 2015-10-30 01:42, Phil Steitz a écrit : This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will execute a software grant with the authors and use t

Re: [VOTE] Accept Naomi

Hello Phil, 2015-10-30 1:42 GMT+01:00 Phil Steitz : > This is a VOTE to accept the code discussed in [1] and available for > review using the git commands below. All are welcome to vote, votes > from PMC members are binding. Assuming a positive vote, we will > execute a software grant with the