+1 :-)
2015-10-20 8:33 GMT+02:00 :
> Repository: commons-lang
> Updated Branches:
> refs/heads/master fd595d747 -> ae865193e
>
>
> Add myself to the developers list
>
>
> Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-lang/repo
> Commit:
> http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons
These are all packages in currently in Debian:
https://packages.debian.org/search?keywords=libcommons
Checking the unstable distribution (the most recently updated package),
these are the packages I saw still depending on ant to build
(Build-Depends):
* libcommons-cli-java 1.3.1-2:
https://sourc
2015-10-19 21:36 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger :
> So is this a global decision, should we drop ant support for all Commons
> components? I think there are only a few still maintaining an ant build,
> and there is no guarantee that these build.xml files are up-to-date.
>
I think I've read, that some of
So is this a global decision, should we drop ant support for all Commons
components? I think there are only a few still maintaining an ant build,
and there is no guarantee that these build.xml files are up-to-date.
Oliver
Am 19.10.2015 um 13:24 schrieb James Carman:
> +1
>
> On Mon, Oct 19, 2015
2015-10-19 20:45 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hello Emmanuel,
>
> 2015-10-19 16:23 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
>
>> Hi Sergio,
>>
>> Le 19/10/2015 15:37, Sergio Fernández a écrit :
>>
>> > So, do you really need the build.xml for maintain
>> > the libcommons-lang-java.deb package?
>>
>> libcommons
FYI: The E-Mail address I extracted from Michael's jira account is
unreachable. I'll try to reach him via jira.
2015-10-19 21:17 GMT+02:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hello Michael,
>
> you have shown quit some interest in the Apache Commons Imaging component
> [1]. There are several pull requests create
Hello Michael,
you have shown quit some interest in the Apache Commons Imaging component
[1]. There are several pull requests created by you at GitHub and we very
much appreciate that. I'd love to apply your changes, but I don't see
sufficient test coverage by unit tests. I know that Imaging is an
Hello Emmanuel,
2015-10-19 16:23 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> Hi Sergio,
>
> Le 19/10/2015 15:37, Sergio Fernández a écrit :
>
> > So, do you really need the build.xml for maintain
> > the libcommons-lang-java.deb package?
>
> libcommons-lang-java contains the old 2.x version, the new 3.x version
Le 17/10/2015 10:41, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> Any idea how we can find out whether this is the case?
For the reference, there is a Debian Sources site [1] where the source
packages can be viewed. The relevant file to check is debian/control [2]
for the current version in the sid suite (i.e. th
OK, got what they told me
https://lists.debian.org/debian-java/2015/10/msg00083.html
And is only used to package version 2.x as libcommons-lang-java,
and libcommons-lang3-java has already been moved to Maven. So Ant build
could be safely removed in 3.x, I think. I've created LANG-1175 to track
tha
Hi Emmanuel,
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi Sergio,
>
> Le 19/10/2015 15:37, Sergio Fernández a écrit :
>
> > So, do you really need the build.xml for maintain
> > the libcommons-lang-java.deb package?
>
> libcommons-lang-java contains the old 2.x version, the new 3.
Hi Sergio,
Le 19/10/2015 15:37, Sergio Fernández a écrit :
> So, do you really need the build.xml for maintain
> the libcommons-lang-java.deb package?
libcommons-lang-java contains the old 2.x version, the new 3.x version
is packaged in libcommons-lang3-java and already uses Maven. So removing
t
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-10-19 15:11 GMT+02:00 Sergio Fernández :
>
> > Has anybody read my previous mail?
> >
> > Keep .deb support is straightforward in Maven too. For I have no idea
> what
> > the setup between the Commons project and the Java Packaging te
2015-10-19 15:11 GMT+02:00 Sergio Fernández :
> Has anybody read my previous mail?
>
> Keep .deb support is straightforward in Maven too. For I have no idea what
> the setup between the Commons project and the Java Packaging team at
> Debian. Maybe I could ask at debian-j...@lists.debian.org...
>
Has anybody read my previous mail?
Keep .deb support is straightforward in Maven too. For I have no idea what
the setup between the Commons project and the Java Packaging team at
Debian. Maybe I could ask at debian-j...@lists.debian.org...
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 1:24 PM, James Carman
wrote:
>
+1
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 5:39 AM Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-10-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) :
>
> > > > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages.
> > >
> > > If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant
> > > build file to explain this requirement
On 19 October 2015 at 10:39, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-10-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) :
>
>> > > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages.
>> >
>> > If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant
>> > build file to explain this requirement.
>>
>>
>> H
2015-10-19 10:50 GMT+02:00 Jan Matèrne (jhm) :
> > > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages.
> >
> > If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant
> > build file to explain this requirement.
>
>
> Haven't looked at the build script.
> But maybe you could keep o
I have quite some experience building Debian packages with Maven (e.g., see
the jdeb build for Marmotta
https://github.com/apache/marmotta/blob/develop/launchers/marmotta-webapp/pom.xml#L124),
so I can help porting the ant task for commons-lang.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Jan Matèrne (jhm)
> > I thought it was being used to create Debian packages.
>
> If this turns out to be the case, then please add a note to the Ant
> build file to explain this requirement.
Haven't looked at the build script.
But maybe you could keep only that part producing the Debian packages and use
Maven an
20 matches
Mail list logo
