Hi, Norman,
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 10:06 PM, wrote:
> My colleague Jeff Rothenberg and I, retirees, have developed an alternative to
> using regular expressions for searching for (and optionally replacing)
> patterns in text.
I admit that I am becoming somewhat cautious by reading about "an
a
Added a pull request with a first pass at moving all of this to a maven
build. builds and generates javadoc fine. Might need some more fine tuning.
On 09/29/2015 08:27 PM, Dave Brosius wrote:
Also the source code is not in the proper package structure. The
class's have packages, but are just
On 9/29/15 3:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Norman,
>
> Hello and welcome to Apache Commons.
>
> It's not clear to me why Naomi is better than regular expressions. Pointing
> to Javadocs is not the best way to get traction.
>
> Your project would be better served by having some documentation on your
Also the source code is not in the proper package structure. The class's
have packages, but are just dumped directly in src. There is javadoc,
but just dumped in the main folder. I just dump that, and having support
building the javadoc from build tools. Setting the structure of the
project up
Perhaps i am blind, but i don't see any maven, ant or gradle build
files. You really need to add these for your code base to be accessible
to others wanted to uptake it. (Hopefully maven).
--dave
On 09/29/2015 06:55 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
Norman,
Hello and welcome to Apache Commons.
It's n
Norman,
Hello and welcome to Apache Commons.
It's not clear to me why Naomi is better than regular expressions. Pointing
to Javadocs is not the best way to get traction.
Your project would be better served by having some documentation on your
front page with an example driven tutorial.
Is Naomi
On 9/29/15 2:24 PM, Gilles wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:58:21 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 9/29/15 11:26 AM, Luca Vercelli wrote:
>>> Dear developers,
>>> I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and
>>> algebra.
>>> In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it on
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 13:58:21 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 9/29/15 11:26 AM, Luca Vercelli wrote:
Dear developers,
I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and
algebra.
In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only
supports
"int" primes, where some "BigInteger"
On 9/29/15 11:26 AM, Luca Vercelli wrote:
> Dear developers,
> I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and algebra.
> In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only supports
> "int" primes, where some "BigInteger" would be required when searching
> for large primes.
My colleague Jeff Rothenberg and I, retirees, have developed an alternative to
using regular expressions for searching for (and optionally replacing)
patterns in text. We believe it is generally useful to Java programmers and
would like to contribute it to Apache Commons, where we will continue to
Am 28.09.2015 um 22:46 schrieb Weygandt, Jon:
> I've created an issue.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CONFIGURATION-611.
>
> Let me get further into the project, and as I have some more concrete ideas,
> I will place them in the comments section.
Thank you, Jon! Looking forward to s
Dear developers,
I think that commons-math lacks support for number theory and algebra.
In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only supports
"int" primes, where some "BigInteger" would be required when searching
for large primes.
Second fact, for algebra applications, Rings and su
Dear developers,
I see some lacks in commons-math, w.r.t. number theory.
In particular, the "primes" package is quite poor, as it only supports
"int" primes, where some BigInteger can be required when searching for
large primes.
Second fact, algebra applications will prefer Rings and such instead o
13 matches
Mail list logo
