Hola,
On 09/21/2015 04:15 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:04:08 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/20/2015 05:51 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 01:12:49 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Wanted to float some ideas for the LeastSquaresOptimizer (Possibly
General Optimizer) design. For e
sebb wrote:
> On 21 September 2015 at 20:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 9/21/15 10:59 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 21 September 2015 at 18:36, Jörg Schaible
>>> wrote:
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Alternative to keep 100% BC
>
> - Remove the new method, release 2.5, and add it back for SN
Hi.
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 15:04:08 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
On 09/20/2015 05:51 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Sun, 20 Sep 2015 01:12:49 -0500, Ole Ersoy wrote:
Wanted to float some ideas for the LeastSquaresOptimizer (Possibly
General Optimizer) design. For example with the
LevenbergMarquardtOptimizer we
On 21 September 2015 at 20:03, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/21/15 10:59 AM, sebb wrote:
>> On 21 September 2015 at 18:36, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>>
Alternative to keep 100% BC
- Remove the new method, release 2.5, and add it back for SNAPSHOT
- Add the new
On 9/21/15 10:36 AM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Alternative to keep 100% BC
>>
>> - Remove the new method, release 2.5, and add it back for SNAPSHOT
>> - Add the new method in a new sub-interface
> or catch and ignore this special RTE when calling the new method form our
> cod
On 9/21/15 10:59 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 September 2015 at 18:36, Jörg Schaible wrote:
>> Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>>> Alternative to keep 100% BC
>>>
>>> - Remove the new method, release 2.5, and add it back for SNAPSHOT
>>> - Add the new method in a new sub-interface
>> or catch and ignore this sp
On 21 September 2015 at 18:36, Jörg Schaible wrote:
> Gary Gregory wrote:
>
>> Alternative to keep 100% BC
>>
>> - Remove the new method, release 2.5, and add it back for SNAPSHOT
>> - Add the new method in a new sub-interface
>
> or catch and ignore this special RTE when calling the new method fo
Gary Gregory wrote:
> Alternative to keep 100% BC
>
> - Remove the new method, release 2.5, and add it back for SNAPSHOT
> - Add the new method in a new sub-interface
or catch and ignore this special RTE when calling the new method form our
code. Old clients never asked for it, new/updated clie
Alternative to keep 100% BC
- Remove the new method, release 2.5, and add it back for SNAPSHOT
- Add the new method in a new sub-interface
Gary
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 10:23 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/19/15 9:55 AM, sebb wrote:
> > On 19 September 2015 at 17:26, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
On 9/19/15 9:55 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 September 2015 at 17:26, Kristian Rosenvold
> wrote:
>> 2015-09-19 13:58 GMT+02:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
>>> Just to be clear on this, the breach is adding an interface to
>> Oops. The breach is adding a /method/.
> That's what I assumed - adding a method to
Hello,
can somebody please review this change and push it to the commons
site? It removes the trunks-proper profile documentation, links to
version 39 and adds some additional hints.
Gruss
Bend
-- Forwarded message --
From:
Date: 2015-09-21 18:00 GMT+02:00
Subject: svn commit:
I have a moment to explain why the PKWARE crypto is stronger than the
WinZip crypto.
1. The key has validation data, the VData and VCRC32 values.
There are a couple different ways to compute a message integrity check that
allows you to verify the encryption key and that the message contents have
12 matches
Mail list logo
