[math] chi-squared test default deg freedom should be n-2 not n-1?

2015-08-22 Thread Andrew Schaumberg
Dear devs, Chi-squared test takes degrees of freedom to be one fewer than the sample count. https://commons.apache.org/proper/commons-math/apidocs/src-html/org/apache/commons/math3/stat/inference/ChiSquareTest.html#line.154 Should be two fewer, right? http://courses.wcupa.edu/rbove/Berenson/10th%

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-22 Thread Oliver Heger
+1 Oliver Am 22.08.2015 um 21:29 schrieb Stefan Bodewig: > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > > +1 Move to git > -1 Stick with s

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-22 Thread Dave Brosius
+1 On 08/22/2015 03:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: Hi all more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than expected :-) Anyway, here is the vote: +1 Move to git -1 Stick with svn vote will be open for 7

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-22 Thread Gary Gregory
+1 Gary On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 12:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > > +1 Move to git > -1 Stick

Re: [VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-22 Thread Torsten Curdt
+1 from me On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 9:29 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > Hi all > > more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating > to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than > expected :-) > > Anyway, here is the vote: > > +1 Move to git > -1 Stick

[VOTE] Move COMPRESS to git

2015-08-22 Thread Stefan Bodewig
Hi all more thann half a year ago I promised to call for a vote for migrating to git as soon as 1.10 has been released. Well that took longer than expected :-) Anyway, here is the vote: +1 Move to git -1 Stick with svn vote will be open for 72 hours Cheers Stefan ---

Re: Assembly in std location

2015-08-22 Thread Gary Gregory
On Sat, Aug 22, 2015 at 4:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 22 August 2015 at 05:44, Gary Gregory wrote: > > I've seen commit fly by about moving assemblies to the std location. > > I did some of the components I have worked on. > > > But, in a project like commons-daemon, in the POM, the old locations ar

Re: Assembly in std location

2015-08-22 Thread sebb
On 22 August 2015 at 05:44, Gary Gregory wrote: > I've seen commit fly by about moving assemblies to the std location. I did some of the components I have worked on. > But, in a project like commons-daemon, in the POM, the old locations are > still used. > > Am I missing something? Not all the