Yep, same thing I said back in the day. Would we want it to be a true
"interceptor" or more of a "listener"?
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 8:18 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 8/8/15 5:04 PM, James Carman wrote:
> > We talked about this a while back with respect to logging,, having a
> > PoolListener interf
On 8/8/15 5:04 PM, James Carman wrote:
> We talked about this a while back with respect to logging,, having a
> PoolListener interface or something.
Right. That could be one use. The nice thing there is the
interceptor could bring in whatever logging / event propagation
infrastructure it wanted
We talked about this a while back with respect to logging,, having a
PoolListener interface or something.
On Sat, Aug 8, 2015 at 7:36 PM Phil Steitz wrote:
> Tomcat's jdbc-pool has an interceptor feature that allows custom
> code to be inserted into methods called on connections managed by
> the
Tomcat's jdbc-pool has an interceptor feature that allows custom
code to be inserted into methods called on connections managed by
the pool. In [pool], we have the core infrastructure to support
this in a generic way via the ProxiedObjectPool. I propose that we
extend this to allow users to confi
