+1
sebb wrote:
> Following on from the discussion, here is what I propose.
>
> ***The intention is to ensure that the SVN repo is not used by
> accident, but still allow users to find the Git repo if they only have
> the SVN URL.***
>
> [Note: as part of the move to Git, the SVN repo is made re
I'll be on vacation the next week. I could do it in two weeks at the
earliest.
Benedikt
2015-05-11 5:26 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> Hello, it is not dormant. It's just that no one has volunteered to cut a
> release candidate. The component is due for a refresh. I did not realize it
> had been so
If you're talking about [lang] 3.4, then I'm the one to blame :-) I had
problems using the reporter and didn't received feedback [1]. Then I forgot
to take care of that. Sorry! Maybe you can help me? If not, you can I get
in touch with?
Benedikt
[1] http://markmail.org/message/ooz5aw3x4tqiphsf
2
Hello, it is not dormant. It's just that no one has volunteered to cut a
release candidate. The component is due for a refresh. I did not realize it had
been so long since a release.
Any volunteers?
Gary
Original message
From: Kervin Pierre
Date: 05/10/2015 18:20 (GMT-06
Hi,
The last snapshot ( 2.5-SNAPSHOT ) seems to be over a year old, and last
release 2.4 was in 2012 ( I believe, please correct me if I'm wrong ).
I started using its Tailer class in 2.4 and realized there are a few
bugs. Some are fixed over a year now in SVN. E.g. commons-io 2.4
version swa
On Sun, May 10, 2015 at 3:19 PM, sebb wrote:
> I think the first job is to ensure that the build works with Maven2/3,
> having tidied up the layout to conform with Maven2/3 conventions
> (src/test/java and src/main/java etc).
>
I worked on a maven branch back in 2010 here:
https://svn.apache.or
We have no 3.4 release under reporter.a.o. Any ideas why? You must be PMC
member to view this site.
Gary
I think the first job is to ensure that the build works with Maven2/3,
having tidied up the layout to conform with Maven2/3 conventions
(src/test/java and src/main/java etc).
I see that a start has been made, but it looks like there is some way to go yet.
On 10 May 2015 at 10:48, Bruno P. Kinoshi
Hi Paul
> if I remember well how the patches of Kohsuke landed, I remember I was
unable to apply them because they seemed to be breaking some of the
"standard command-line jelly". I think I remember that a pluggeable
context was discussed but, maybe, was not developed.
Any kind of background on old