Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2

2015-04-04 Thread Chas Honton
I have changes which will get tests to pass. Any preference to whether they should be added to 3.4 or 3.5? Chas > On Apr 4, 2015, at 5:01 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > 2015-04-04 10:57 GMT+02:00 Duncan Jones : > >> +0 (non-binding) >> >> Built from zipped sources, digests look fine. JDK 1.8

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2

2015-04-04 Thread Oliver Heger
Maven and ant builds are now successful on Windows 8.1 with Java 1.6 and 1.7. Artifacts and site look good. +1 Thanks, Benedikt! Oliver Am 03.04.2015 um 14:56 schrieb Benedikt Ritter: > Hi all, > > We've worked through the issues identified in Commons Lang 3.4 RC1, so I > would like to call a

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2

2015-04-04 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2015-04-04 10:57 GMT+02:00 Duncan Jones : > +0 (non-binding) > > Built from zipped sources, digests look fine. JDK 1.8.0_40 on Win 8.1. > (Site build fails as mentioned already). > Site builds fine from JDK 1.7.0_75. For me the FindBugs page is blank, > not sure if that's to be expected? > > 97 sk

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2

2015-04-04 Thread Duncan Jones
+0 (non-binding) Built from zipped sources, digests look fine. JDK 1.8.0_40 on Win 8.1. (Site build fails as mentioned already). Site builds fine from JDK 1.7.0_75. For me the FindBugs page is blank, not sure if that's to be expected? 97 skipped tests seems a little high (think this was mentioned

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Lang 3.4 based on RC2

2015-04-04 Thread Sergio Fernández
+1 (non-binding) So far I've checked: signatures and digests. source release file layout, matched tags and commit ids, NOTICE and LICENSE files, build sources in a clean environment (maven 3.0.5, jdks 7u71-2.5.3 and 8.0_25, under debian 64bits) On Fri, Apr 3, 2015 at 2:56 PM, Benedikt Ritter wr