Re: Design guidelines and SemVer

2015-02-17 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2015-02-18 5:09 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell : > On 18 February 2015 at 12:28, sebb wrote: > > On 17 February 2015 at 22:56, Peter Ansell > wrote: > >> On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote: > >>> On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter > wrote: > >> > >> > >> > and the maven coordina

Re: Design guidelines and SemVer

2015-02-17 Thread Peter Ansell
On 18 February 2015 at 12:28, sebb wrote: > On 17 February 2015 at 22:56, Peter Ansell wrote: >> On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote: >>> On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> >> >> and the maven coordinates when we break binary compatibility (= bump up the maj

Re: Anyone interested in regular expressions, again?

2015-02-17 Thread Benson Margulies
Thanks! I look forward to retiring mine! On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 8:48 PM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > That's great news! Thanks James! > Bruno > > From: James Ring > To: Commons Developers List > Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:31 PM > Subject: Re: Anyone interested in regular expr

Re: Anyone interested in regular expressions, again?

2015-02-17 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
That's great news! Thanks James! Bruno From: James Ring To: Commons Developers List Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2015 11:31 PM Subject: Re: Anyone interested in regular expressions, again? Hey Benson, Just wanted to let you and the rest of the commons dev list that re2j is now in

Re: Anyone interested in regular expressions, again?

2015-02-17 Thread James Ring
Hey Benson, Just wanted to let you and the rest of the commons dev list that re2j is now in the open: please see https://github.com/google/re2j. Please take a look! Regards, James On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:16 PM, Benson Margulies wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:36 PM, James Ring wrote: >> I'

Re: Design guidelines and SemVer

2015-02-17 Thread sebb
On 17 February 2015 at 22:56, Peter Ansell wrote: > On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote: >> On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > >>> and the maven coordinates when we break binary compatibility (= bump up the >>> major version number). We do this to avoid jar hell. Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/17/15 2:29 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 02/17/2015 05:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> Quite a few bugs have been fixed since DBCP 2.0.1 and a few new >> features have been added. It is time for a 2.1 release. >> >> The release is available for review here: >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dis

Re: Design guidelines and SemVer

2015-02-17 Thread Peter Ansell
On 17 February 2015 at 21:48, sebb wrote: > On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> and the maven coordinates when we break binary compatibility (= bump up the >> major version number). We do this to avoid jar hell. This way two versions >> of the same commons library can be in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 02/17/2015 05:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Quite a few bugs have been fixed since DBCP 2.0.1 and a few new > features have been added. It is time for a 2.1 release. > > The release is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/dbcp (r8031) > > The release was b

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/17/15 1:59 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Build (both Maven and ant) was successful on Windows 8.1 with JDK 1.7. > Artifacts and site look good. > > So here is my +1. > > Minor nit: On the site there is currently no entry for the Javadocs of > the new release. I guess it will be added after the rel

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread Oliver Heger
Build (both Maven and ant) was successful on Windows 8.1 with JDK 1.7. Artifacts and site look good. So here is my +1. Minor nit: On the site there is currently no entry for the Javadocs of the new release. I guess it will be added after the release? Oliver My exact configuration: $ mvn -versio

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread Phil Steitz
On 2/17/15 7:38 AM, Bruno P. Kinoshita wrote: > Hi Phil, > Builds fine with > > Apache Maven 3.2.1 (ea8b2b07643dbb1b84b6d16e1f08391b666bc1e9; > 2014-02-14T15:37:52-03:00)Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.2.1Java version: > 1.7.0_65, vendor: Oracle CorporationJava home: /opt/jdk1.7.0_65/jreDefault

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread Phil Steitz
Here is my +1 Phil On 2/16/15 9:04 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > Quite a few bugs have been fixed since DBCP 2.0.1 and a few new > features have been added. It is time for a 2.1 release. > > The release is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/dbcp (r8031) > > Th

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi Phil, Builds fine with Apache Maven 3.2.1 (ea8b2b07643dbb1b84b6d16e1f08391b666bc1e9; 2014-02-14T15:37:52-03:00)Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.2.1Java version: 1.7.0_65, vendor: Oracle CorporationJava home: /opt/jdk1.7.0_65/jreDefault locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8OS name: "linux",

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons DBCP 2.1 RC1 as 2.1

2015-02-17 Thread sebb
For completeness, here are the main Nexus hashes: /org/apache/commons/commons-dbcp2/2.1/commons-dbcp2-2.1-tests.jar (SHA1: f4463d624c494746aa01f009f0886012f9601710) /org/apache/commons/commons-dbcp2/2.1/commons-dbcp2-2.1-sources.jar (SHA1: 305da0aa5f560ab4c8e3bee855582829c51fb744) /org/apache/comm

Re: Design guidelines and SemVer

2015-02-17 Thread sebb
On 17 February 2015 at 06:13, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > Hello Peter > > 2015-02-15 22:49 GMT+01:00 Peter Ansell : > >> On 15 February 2015 at 21:29, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >> >> >> > We like to underline, that we have no experience with the RDF >> > specification. From a technical point of view w

Re: [math] Create 3.5 branch, update trunk to 4.0

2015-02-17 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Thomas, Le 17/02/2015 00:09, Thomas Neidhart a écrit : > On 02/10/2015 09:49 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> there was some discussion about this a while ago, and it seemed that >> there was consensus to do as written in the subject. >> >> If there are no objections, then I will soo