On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:39 AM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> On 02/03/2015 01:46 AM, Benson Margulies wrote:
>> The irony here is that the Java HSRE port happened because it seemed
>> easier than an RE2 port. Note the same statements about API's pretty
>> much apply.
>
> I am sorry, my response was no
On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 8:20 AM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 30/01/15 23:15, Reto Gmür wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Sergio Fernández
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Summarizing, we understand that the Apache Commons project wants to keep
>>> the communication rules as they currently are
On 03/02/15 15:42, Reto Gmür wrote:
Should BNode be shareable across Graphs? The Abstract Syntax says that they
can be shared across the graphs of the same dataset,
Yes - they can be shared.
The note about shared across the graphs of the same dataset is to
highlight an important point. It is
On Tue, Feb 3, 2015 at 2:53 PM, Andy Seaborne
wrote:
> [snip]
>
> Why preclude graphs across JVMs (in time or space)?
>
What is imho best limited to a JVM instance is the existence of a BNode
beyond its existence within the Graph. The Graph itself can be represented
by multiple Graph Objects spre
Hi Peter, Hi Andy,
I think the Commons RDF API should model the Abstract Syntax, and to quote
the spec "Blank node identifiers are *not* part of the RDF abstract
syntax". Of course if there are very important pragmatic reason to have
some identifiers in the API we can consider having them neverthe
