On 31 January 2015 at 00:10, sebb wrote:
> On 30 January 2015 at 15:41, sebb wrote:
>> I've just had a look at the new class ZCompressorInputStream.
>
> Sorry, I meant LZWInputStream
Which I just realised is mainly a copy of the internal version. Pity
the SVN history does not show this.
Given t
On 30 January 2015 at 15:41, sebb wrote:
> I've just had a look at the new class ZCompressorInputStream.
Sorry, I meant LZWInputStream
> This has lots of mutable protected fields.
>
> For example,
>
> protected int clearCode = -1;
> protected int codeSize = 9;
>
> clearCode has a protect
On 30 January 2015 at 17:34, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 30/01/2015 17:48, Gary Gregory a écrit :
>
>> Well, we cannot break BC in a minor release for a public class. Are we
>> sure BC breaks?
>>
>> If we want to make this internal package public, it needs to be copied to
>> the new location, not
+1 not binding.
Build works fine with:
Maven home: /opt/apache-maven-3.2.3
Java version: 1.7.0_75, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib/jvm/java-7-openjdk-amd64/jre
Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: UTF-8
OS name: "linux", version: "3.13.0-44-generic", arch: "amd64", family: "u
Le 30/01/2015 17:48, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Well, we cannot break BC in a minor release for a public class. Are we
> sure BC breaks?
>
> If we want to make this internal package public, it needs to be copied to
> the new location, not moved. Then ZCompressorInputStream would still extend
> the
I've just had a look at the new class ZCompressorInputStream.
This has lots of mutable protected fields.
For example,
protected int clearCode = -1;
protected int codeSize = 9;
clearCode has a protected setter, but no getter.
What's the point of that?
As far as I can tell, these are fie
On 30 January 2015 at 16:48, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>
>> On 2015-01-30, sebb wrote:
>>
>> > On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> >> On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>
>> >>> - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Sh
On Wed, Jan 28, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Sergio Fernández wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> after the intense discussions last weeks, this week we're coming down to
> what could be a suitable approach for Commons RDF.
>
> Summarizing, we understand that the Apache Commons project wants to keep
> the communicati
Hello Stefan,
2015-01-30 20:41 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig :
> On 2015-01-30, Gary Gregory wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig
> wrote:
>
> >> The superclass of ZCompressorInputStream has changed from one we've
> >> removed with the old __internal__ package to a new one in
On 2015-01-30, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> The superclass of ZCompressorInputStream has changed from one we've
>> removed with the old __internal__ package to a new one in the now
>> supported lzw package.
> Well, we cannot break BC in a minor
2015-01-30 15:02 GMT+01:00 Sergio Fernández :
> On 30/01/15 14:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
>
>> I hope you would still feel welcome to become an unofficial mentor
>> (teaching us the "Apache Commons way" perhaps) even if you haven't got the
>> right badges (yet). :)
>>
>
> Well, I'd like to hav
On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:06 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2015-01-30, sebb wrote:
>
> > On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> >> On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> >>> - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Should it be?
>
> >> This is only there for historical reason
On 30/01/15 14:36, Stian Soiland-Reyes wrote:
I hope you would still feel welcome to become an unofficial mentor
(teaching us the "Apache Commons way" perhaps) even if you haven't got the
right badges (yet). :)
Well, I'd like to have Benedikt as actual mentor. It happened many times
that a pro
I hope you would still feel welcome to become an unofficial mentor
(teaching us the "Apache Commons way" perhaps) even if you haven't got the
right badges (yet). :)
Other incubator projects have also had unofficial mentors - it's a good way
into Incubator PMC.
On 29 Jan 2015 14:29, "Benedikt Ritt
OK, next attempt.
Compress 1.10 RC2 is available for review here:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/compress/
(svn revision 7884)
Maven artifacts are here:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1081/org/apache/commons/commons-compress/1.10/
On 2015-01-30, sebb wrote:
> On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>> - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Should it be?
>> This is only there for historical reasons, I don't even think the other
>> components still have a file like t
On 30 January 2015 at 08:20, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Should it be?
>
> This is only there for historical reasons, I don't even think the other
> components still have a file like this. I've removed it completely
On 30/01/15 07:45, Sergio Fernández wrote:
On 29/01/15 15:28, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
So maybe it's better if someone else steps up (we have people here who
meet
the necessary requirements), and I will just join the incubator
commons rdf
community and help you that way.
Yes, having you in the c
On 2015-01-28, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> - PROPOSAL.txt is not in the src archives. Should it be?
This is only there for historical reasons, I don't even think the other
components still have a file like this. I've removed it completely.
> - there is a typo in the release notes. The first line s
19 matches
Mail list logo