Hi Stian and Reto,
Blank nodes are hard to support within a single system. They are
fairly close to unsustainable within a general system. However, within
a system that has RDF-1.1 as its theoretical basis, the W3C spec
defines the mapping functions that are necessary to define equivalence
between
On 2015-01-27, Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
> kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I've run through all of our tests and the release looks good.
>> The testcase should fail 1 in 1000 times as is and has been fixed.
>> I'm +1 on the release as su
2015-01-27 21:21 GMT+01:00 Apache Continuum :
> Online report :
> https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=39308&projectId=256
>
> Build statistics:
> State: Failed
> Previous State: Ok
> Started at: Tue 27 Jan 2015 20:20:35 +
> Finished at: Tue 27 Jan 2015
I agree that "local scope" should be clarified - I have been just as confused!
By keeping the "internalIdentifier" property, an application is able
to talk about an existing blankNode without having to keep track of
earlier BlankNode instances (e.g. not needing their own
Map).
It also means that
2015-01-27 15:24 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> I'd prefer a clean RC to give a positive vote. So I'll abstain for now.
That seems to be the norm :)
K
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional comm
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 4:54 AM, Kristian Rosenvold <
kristian.rosenv...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've run through all of our tests and the release looks good.
>
> The testcase should fail 1 in 1000 times as is and has been fixed.
>
> I'm +1 on the release as such (but we'd normally recut or leave this
It's Clirr Report as far as I can tell.
On 27 January 2015 at 14:04, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-01-27 14:50 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>
>> The problem is that Java8 class files include some new constant types
>> that the currently available release of BCEL cannot handle.
>>
>
> Did you find out, which
2015-01-27 14:50 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> The problem is that Java8 class files include some new constant types
> that the currently available release of BCEL cannot handle.
>
Did you find out, which maven plugin fails (if it's not cobertura)?
>
> A work-round is to use Java 7 to run Maven when build
The problem is that Java8 class files include some new constant types
that the currently available release of BCEL cannot handle.
A work-round is to use Java 7 to run Maven when building the site.
On 27 January 2015 at 13:31, sebb wrote:
> It's not CP37 because Java8 also fails with CP36
>
> Nor
2015-01-27 14:31 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> It's not CP37 because Java8 also fails with CP36
>
> Nor is it Cobertura, because it fails with -Psite-basic -Dclirr.skip=false
>
> Unfortunately -X does not seem to show the name of the offending class.
>
> I'm continuing to investigate, but I think we can let
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 12:29 AM, Peter Ansell
wrote:
> The only sticking point then and now IMO is the purely academic
> distinction of opening up internal labels for blank nodes versus not
> opening it up at all. Reto is against having the API allow access to
> the identifiers on academic groun
It's not CP37 because Java8 also fails with CP36
Nor is it Cobertura, because it fails with -Psite-basic -Dclirr.skip=false
Unfortunately -X does not seem to show the name of the offending class.
I'm continuing to investigate, but I think we can let the CP37 release go ahead.
It may be that we
2015-01-27 13:42 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> On 27 January 2015 at 08:10, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> > 2015-01-25 12:15 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all Apache
> >> Commons components.
> >>
> >>
> >> This is a VOTE to release Commo
2015-01-27 13:51 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> It also fails for me using Java 8 on MacOSX.
>
> I am looking into it now.
>
Could be related to cobertura...
>
> On 27 January 2015 at 12:42, sebb wrote:
> > On 27 January 2015 at 08:10, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> >> 2015-01-25 12:15 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> >>
>
It also fails for me using Java 8 on MacOSX.
I am looking into it now.
On 27 January 2015 at 12:42, sebb wrote:
> On 27 January 2015 at 08:10, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>> 2015-01-25 12:15 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>>
>>> Hello All,
>>>
>>> The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all Apa
Hello,
I can confirm the trunk works with VFS. Thanks, looking forward to it.
Gruss
Bernd
Am Tue, 27 Jan 2015 12:42:04 +
schrieb sebb :
> On 27 January 2015 at 08:10, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> > 2015-01-25 12:15 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> >
> >> Hello All,
> >>
> >> The Apache Commons Parent POM
On 27 January 2015 at 08:10, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2015-01-25 12:15 GMT+01:00 sebb :
>
>> Hello All,
>>
>> The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all Apache
>> Commons components.
>>
>>
>> This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 37 from RC2.
>>
>>
>> This VOTE by LAZY-CONSE
Le 27/01/2015 05:36, Mark Roberts a écrit :
> To repeat - constructing the local variables from the local variable types
> is totally bogus. I have no idea how that fixed the original problem but
> it is clearly incorrect.
Ok, could you reopen BCEL-79 and copy your comment in JIRA please? Would
I've run through all of our tests and the release looks good.
The testcase should fail 1 in 1000 times as is and has been fixed.
I'm +1 on the release as such (but we'd normally recut or leave this
decision to the RM).
Krisian
2015-01-27 7:35 GMT+01:00 Kristian Rosenvold :
> Done in r165498
Le 27/01/2015 05:02, Mark Roberts a écrit :
> Which takes us to another question I was going to ask - is there a BCEL test
> suite? 'mvn verify' is ok for build verification - but it doesn't begin to
> cover the bases of what the api can do - especially in the area of code
> modification.
You ca
2015-01-25 12:15 GMT+01:00 sebb :
> Hello All,
>
> The Apache Commons Parent POM provides common settings for all Apache
> Commons components.
>
>
> This is a VOTE to release Commons Parent 37 from RC2.
>
>
> This VOTE by LAZY-CONSENSUS is open for at least 72 hours until
> January 28 11:30 UTC.
>
21 matches
Mail list logo
