Code Donation Inquiry

hi Commons Dev@, Over in the Crawler Commons project [0] we are discussing the topic of donating code to TheASF and potentially under the Apache Commons project. Crawler commons is a Java library which builds and maintains shares components for crawlers. We have been making pretty regular releases

[Commons Wiki] Update of "VfsExampleShell" by BerndEckenfels

Dear Wiki user, You have subscribed to a wiki page or wiki category on "Commons Wiki" for change notification. The "VfsExampleShell" page has been changed by BerndEckenfels: https://wiki.apache.org/commons/VfsExampleShell?action=diff&rev1=5&rev2=6 Comment: Thanks to Dave Marion for HDFS example

Re: [vfs] PMC: please review sandbox' NOTICE.txt

Hello, thanks for the comments Phil. I have removed the mention of sandbox from the toplevel NOTICE.txt and the sandbox/NOTICE.txt again. I am not sure what to put in a readme, but since I already explained the sandbox situation on the new site, I will not anything besides that: http://people.a

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 1/11/15 11:19 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: >> On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >>> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: > On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: >> Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem

Jenkins build became unstable: Commons Math #22

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Re: [RESULT][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

On 01/11/2015 07:38 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 08/01/2015 20:24, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : >> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.1 from release >> candidate 1. >> >> Tag name: >> MATH_3_4_1_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') >> >> Tag URL: >> >>

Re: [compress] Finished with my changes

On 2015-01-10, Kristian Rosenvold wrote: > 2015-01-10 15:29 GMT+01:00 Stefan Bodewig : >> what about the (unrelated) COMPRESS-290? > I'll see what I can do. Should be simple compared to the other stuff > I've been dealing with :) Just asking whether you intend to do anything about it or whether w

Re: svn commit: r1650632 - in /commons/proper/compress/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/compress/archivers/zip: ZipArchiveEntry.java ZipArchiveOutputStream.java

On 2015-01-09, wrote: > @@ -336,20 +338,48 @@ public class ZipArchiveEntry extends jav > * @since 1.1 > */ > public ZipExtraField[] getExtraFields(boolean includeUnparseable) { >+return includeUnparseable ? >+getAllExtraFields() : >+getPars

Re: svn commit: r1650930 - /commons/proper/vfs/trunk/NOTICE.txt

On 1/11/15 10:33 AM, e...@apache.org wrote: > Author: ecki > Date: Sun Jan 11 17:33:44 2015 > New Revision: 1650930 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1650930 > Log: > notice: add pointer to sandbox/NOTICE.txt, update copyright year > > Modified: > commons/proper/vfs/trunk/NOTICE.txt > > Modified:

[RESULT][VOTE][RC1] Release Commons Math 3.4.1

Le 08/01/2015 20:24, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.1 from release > candidate 1. > > Tag name: > MATH_3_4_1_RC1 (signature can be checked from git using 'git tag -v') > > Tag URL: > >

Re: [MATH] Jenkins unit test failure

On 1/10/15 10:49 PM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/9/15 6:09 PM, sebb wrote: >> On 10 January 2015 at 01:01, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> On 1/9/15 5:32 PM, sebb wrote: On 9 January 2015 at 23:48, sebb wrote: > Of the last 6 runs, only 1 had a problem with unit test failures. > > All the b

Re: [vfs] PMC: please review sandbox' NOTICE.txt

Hello, my main reason is, that currently the build artifacts of sandbox do contain a notice file which does not contain anything on that issue. So, I can understand you do not want to have a specific NOTICE file for sandbox, but in that case I would suggest to not ship the missleading generic fil

Re: [vfs] PMC: please review sandbox' NOTICE.txt

On 1/11/15 10:22 AM, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: > Hello, > > the Sandbox module of VFS is and will not be built or released by > Apache Commons, however I think we should nevertheless have an > up-to-date NOTICE file for the artifacts. Why, exactly? We are not releasing / redistributing these thin

[vfs] PMC: please review sandbox' NOTICE.txt

Hello, the Sandbox module of VFS is and will not be built or released by Apache Commons, however I think we should nevertheless have an up-to-date NOTICE file for the artifacts. So what I did is I created a seperate file and commited (r1650926) it. Once the PMC aproves, I will also add it to th

Re: [math] tail probabilites

On 1/11/15 10:04 AM, Phil Steitz wrote: > On 1/11/15 9:26 AM, Gilles wrote: >> On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> There is a feature request implicit in MATH-1185 - to add direct >>> computation of (upper) tail probabilities, so users can avoid loss >>> of significance error

Re: [math] tail probabilites

On 1/11/15 9:26 AM, Gilles wrote: > On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: >> There is a feature request implicit in MATH-1185 - to add direct >> computation of (upper) tail probabilities, so users can avoid loss >> of significance errors when computing them from cumulative >> proba

Re: [math] tail probabilites

On Fri, 09 Jan 2015 10:55:53 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote: There is a feature request implicit in MATH-1185 - to add direct computation of (upper) tail probabilities, so users can avoid loss of significance errors when computing them from cumulative probabilities, which is the only thing they can do

Re: [VOTE] Release Aoache Commons Validator 1.4.1 based on RC3

On 1/11/15 5:25 AM, James Carman wrote: > Why is any of this being done manually? So we know what we are doing and so we can inspect tags and artifacts. The "push one button" mutate tags approach is not appealing to many of us. Every Commons RC I have ever cut, and hopefully will ever cut follows

Re: AW: [VFS] Implementing custom hdfs file system using commons-vfs 2.0

Updated to the latest commit, built with 'mvn clean install' and 'mvn clean install site'. Both succeeded, anything else you need me to try? - Original Message - From: "Bernd Eckenfels" To: "Commons Developers List" Sent: Saturday, January 10, 2015 9:00:37 PM Subject: AW: [VFS] Imp

Re: [MATH] Github pull request notifications don't work

Le 11/01/2015 11:23, Luc Maisonobe a écrit : > Does anyone know how to handle this? If a commit message contains a reference to the issue number it'll be closed automatically (For example "Fixed issue foo (#123)"). Alternatively the infra team can be asked to close the issue. Emmanuel Bourg --

Re: [VOTE] Release Aoache Commons Validator 1.4.1 based on RC3

Why is any of this being done manually? On Sunday, January 11, 2015, Benedikt Ritter wrote: > 2015-01-11 11:03 GMT+01:00 Luc Maisonobe >: > > > Le 10/01/2015 19:51, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > > > Hi all, > > > > > > we have fixed the issues which where found in RC2 (and a lot more ;-)) > so >

Re: [VOTE] Release Aoache Commons Validator 1.4.1 based on RC3

2015-01-11 11:03 GMT+01:00 Luc Maisonobe : > Le 10/01/2015 19:51, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > > Hi all, > > > > we have fixed the issues which where found in RC2 (and a lot more ;-)) so > > I'd like to call a new vote to release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.1 > based > > on RC3. > > > > Changes be

Re: [MATH] Github pull request notifications don't work

Hi, Le 10/01/2015 22:39, Phil Steitz a écrit : > On 1/8/15 4:11 AM, James Carman wrote: >> Apache Camel's pull requests do show up on the dev list. It might be >> nice to see these. Otherwise, we might not know there is a >> contribution out there waiting for us. > > I would rather see them fir

Re: [Math] Java version (Was: [MATH] Jenkins build)

Le 08/01/2015 12:34, Gilles a écrit : > Hi. > > Raising this issue once again. > Are we going to upgrade the requirement for the next major release? > > [ ] Java 5 > [ ] Java 6 > [ ] Java 7 > [ ] Java 8 > [ ] Java 9 I would say 7 or 8. best regards, Luc > > ? > > Gilles > > > On Thu,

Re: [VOTE] Release Aoache Commons Validator 1.4.1 based on RC3

Le 10/01/2015 19:51, Benedikt Ritter a écrit : > Hi all, > > we have fixed the issues which where found in RC2 (and a lot more ;-)) so > I'd like to call a new vote to release Apache Commons Validator 1.4.1 based > on RC3. > > Changes between RC2 and RC3: > - Removed dependency to methods > Java