Le 19/12/2014 02:14, sebb a écrit :
> If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all?
It's not all white or all black. And we are voting on the quality of the
code, not on the quality of the VOTE mail (which was good enough to me
at least). Look at a VOTE for commons-collections 8 years
Send from my mobile device
> Am 18.12.2014 um 15:54 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
>> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>>
>> Hello Oliver,
>>
>> I've tested with Maven 3.2.3 and Java 7 and 8.
>>
>> - The build works finde with both Java versions. I get a lot of log
>> state
Le 19/12/2014 03:25, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>>
>> If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all?
>>
>
> I'm with Sebb here. Yes, our release process is a PITA, but what Sebb is
> asking for is what I expect as well. If you want me to evalu
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 8:14 PM, sebb wrote:
>
> If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all?
>
I'm with Sebb here. Yes, our release process is a PITA, but what Sebb is
asking for is what I expect as well. If you want me to evaluate a RC and
VOTE, please make my life and that of all
If it's not done properly, why bother with a VOTE at all?
On 19 December 2014 at 00:51, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 19/12/2014 01:08, sebb a écrit :
>
>> The VOTE email should include all the information needed to validate a
>> release.
>
> You are right but this is exactly the kind of hassle tha
Le 19/12/2014 01:08, sebb a écrit :
> The VOTE email should include all the information needed to validate a
> release.
You are right but this is exactly the kind of hassle that makes release
management tedious and discourages people from publishing releases. At
some point a balance has to be fo
On 18 December 2014 at 23:56, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Le 19/12/2014 00:50, sebb a écrit :
>> On 18 December 2014 at 23:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.
>>>
>>> Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly
>>> different from
Le 19/12/2014 00:50, sebb a écrit :
> On 18 December 2014 at 23:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.
>>
>> Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly
>> different from other components. To clone a fresh tag, run this command
>>
On 18 December 2014 at 23:19, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.
>
> Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly
> different from other components. To clone a fresh tag, run this command
> (beware I have split it in 2 lines below):
This is a [VOTE] for releasing Apache Commons Math 3.4.
Note that since [math] now uses git, access to the tag is slightly
different from other components. To clone a fresh tag, run this command
(beware I have split it in 2 lines below):
git clone https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons
Hello,
Am 03.12.2014 um 12:53 schrieb Gilles:
Hello.
On Wed, 03 Dec 2014 10:13:08 +0100, Thorsten Kiefer wrote:
Hi,
the port is now finished.
The code may still contain bugs.
Maybe alpha-state.
But if you like it, you can add it.
Thank you for offering code to enhance the scope of Commons Ma
I am rather surprised by the approach here.
There are several RDF-related projects - Jena, Marmotta, Any23, Stanbol,
Clerezza and other that use RDF.
How do they fit in?
reto wrote:
Following the recent announcement and as mentioned yesterday I've started
some steps towards commons RDF.
Ho
Le 18/12/2014 21:31, l...@apache.org a écrit :
> Repository: commons-math
> Updated Tags: refs/tags/MATH_3_4_RC1 [created] f38f96a0b
Tag notifications are missing the component prefix. I opened a ticket to
address this (INFRA-8916).
Emmanuel Bourg
--
I just landed two commits for COMMONS-295 and COMMONS-296, which is
the groundwork for proper parallel support. The icing on the cake (the
high-level api with "nThreads" configuration and single point of
entry) is still work-in-progress and can be seen at
https://github.com/krosenvold/commons-compr
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 3:17 PM, Reto Gmür wrote:
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>>
>> 2014-12-18 14:10 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
>> >
>> > Hi Benedikt,
>> >
>> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Benedikt Ritter
>> > wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hello Reto,
>> > >
>> > >
On 12/12/2014 09:38 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the second alpha version of [configuration] 2.0 based
> on the first release candidate. After the first alpha version, a couple
> of enhancement requests have been implemented causing some minor changes
> on interfaces. D
On 12/18/14 6:03 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/12/2014 11:37, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>> You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change the
>>> code/fix bugs/implement new features, they should be able to modify the
>>> corresponding jira tickets.
>> They should be able... y
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> 2014-12-18 14:10 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
> >
> > Hi Benedikt,
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello Reto,
> > >
> > > 2014-12-18 13:29 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
> > > >
> > > > Hi all,
> > > >
>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 9:44 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Hello Oliver,
>
> I've tested with Maven 3.2.3 and Java 7 and 8.
>
> - The build works finde with both Java versions. I get a lot of log
> statements when executing tests. IMHO tests should not write log messages.
> - Signs and hashes are
Hello Oliver,
I've tested with Maven 3.2.3 and Java 7 and 8.
- The build works finde with both Java versions. I get a lot of log
statements when executing tests. IMHO tests should not write log messages.
- Signs and hashes are good
- Artifact contents look good
- Clirr shows some errors, but sinc
Looks good for an alpha2: +1
Tested on:
Apache Maven 3.2.3 (33f8c3e1027c3ddde99d3cdebad2656a31e8fdf4;
2014-08-11T16:58:10-04:00)
Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.2.3
Java version: 1.7.0_71, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_71\jre
Default locale: en_US, platfo
2014-12-14 23:10 GMT+01:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita :
>
> > Sounds good, although I'm not sure I understand where you are going
> with> the marker interface. What is it's purpose?
> Let's then keep the StringMetric interface and update its Javadoc.
> Thinking again, that other marker interface seems to b
Thank you!
2014-12-18 12:33 GMT+01:00 :
>
> Author: sebb
> Date: Thu Dec 18 11:33:39 2014
> New Revision: 1646441
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1646441
> Log:
> Clarify
>
> Modified:
> commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/mail-lists.xml
>
> Modified: commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/mail-l
2014-12-18 14:10 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
>
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Reto,
> >
> > 2014-12-18 13:29 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Following the recent announcement and as mentioned yesterday I've
> started
> >
Hi Benedikt,
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 12:43 PM, Benedikt Ritter
wrote:
>
> Hello Reto,
>
> 2014-12-18 13:29 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Following the recent announcement and as mentioned yesterday I've started
> > some steps towards commons RDF.
> >
> > The Apache Clerezza projec
On 18 December 2014 at 13:03, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 18/12/2014 11:37, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>>> You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change the
>>> code/fix bugs/implement new features, they should be able to modify the
>>> corresponding jira tickets.
>>
>> They should
On 18/12/2014 11:37, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change the
>> code/fix bugs/implement new features, they should be able to modify the
>> corresponding jira tickets.
>
> They should be able... yes.
> But does thatt mean we've got to enab
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:49 AM, sebb wrote:
>
> On 18 December 2014 at 11:37, Jochen Wiedmann
> wrote:
> >> You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change
> the
> >> code/fix bugs/implement new features, they should be able to modify the
> >> corresponding jira tickets.
>
Hello Reto,
2014-12-18 13:29 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
>
> Hi all,
>
> Following the recent announcement and as mentioned yesterday I've started
> some steps towards commons RDF.
>
> The Apache Clerezza project has the goal to provide an "API modeling the
> W3C RDF standard without any vendor specific
Hi all,
Following the recent announcement and as mentioned yesterday I've started
some steps towards commons RDF.
The Apache Clerezza project has the goal to provide an "API modeling the
W3C RDF standard without any vendor specific additions". We have been
providing such an API for several years
On 18 December 2014 at 11:37, Jochen Wiedmann wrote:
>> You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change the
>> code/fix bugs/implement new features, they should be able to modify the
>> corresponding jira tickets.
>
> They should be able... yes.
> But does thatt mean we've go
> You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change the
> code/fix bugs/implement new features, they should be able to modify the
> corresponding jira tickets.
They should be able... yes.
But does thatt mean we've got to enable it for all ASF now? I don't
think so. If someone's
On 17 December 2014 at 10:50, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi Sebb,
>
> Le 17/12/2014 02:21, sebb a écrit :
>> On 17 December 2014 at 00:01, Phil Steitz wrote:
>>> On 12/16/14 1:51 PM, sebb wrote:
On 16 December 2014 at 08:58, luc wrote:
> Hi Phil,
>
> Le 2014-12-16 00:49, pste...@apa
2014-12-14 20:16 GMT+01:00 :
>
> Author: britter
> Date: Sun Dec 14 19:16:56 2014
> New Revision: 1645502
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1645502
> Log:
> Add commons notifications list to the list of mailing lists
>
> Modified:
> commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/mail-lists.xml
>
> Modified:
Hi Reto,
see my comment on the other thread. We can use git://
git.apache.org/commons-rdf.git if you like. Let me know when you're ready
to publish a website for this component.
Benedikt
2014-12-17 20:15 GMT+01:00 :
>
> Author: reto
> Date: Wed Dec 17 19:15:22 2014
> New Revision: 1646312
>
> UR
Hi Adrian,
2014-12-18 3:47 GMT+01:00 Adrian Crum :
>
> The challenge will be to keep Jira up-to-date. I would like to wrap up
> some Jira issues too, but ASF committers do not have edit permissions in
> Commons Jira.
>
You're bringing up a valid point here... If ASF committers can change the
code
Hi Reto,
2014-12-17 16:23 GMT+01:00 Reto Gmür :
>
> Hi,
>
> This sounds like a great occasion to publish a revised version of the core
> RDF libraries in clerezza as Commons RDF.
>
> This has been the topic of several discussions already. The Clerezza RDF
> libraries are strictly based on the RDF
+1 for moving to git btw :)
Kristian
2014-12-15 11:38 GMT+01:00 Emmanuel Bourg :
> Le 15/12/2014 11:36, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>
>> [as an aside, maybe we should think about moving Compress to git]
>
> +1
>
> Emmanuel
>
>
> -
>
38 matches
Mail list logo
