Re: [Math] Would like to know, if extensions are needed

Hi, I decided to port it to java, and if you should like it, you can extend [Math] with RL algorithms. https://github.com/toki78/JuRLs/tree/master/JuRLs/src/jurls/core It will take a while, until I ported it all to java. Regards Thorsten Am 15.11.2014 um 15:01 schrieb Gilles: On Sat, 15 Nov 2

Re: [VFS][ALL] SVN rollback?

Hello, yeah I somewhat could understand that the webview has its own mirror. I see now, the svn.apache.org is a globally load balanced IP. Ugh... I guess I should live with that instead of picking a specific mirror. I like Gits understanding of distributed version control better :)) Thanks Ber

Re: [VFS][ALL] SVN rollback?

Am Mon, 17 Nov 2014 23:19:25 +0100 schrieb Bernd Eckenfels : > Hello, > > can anybody explain that? ... It is visible now. Not sure why (I had mailed INFRA, maybe they care) - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apa

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons CSV 1.1-RC1

+1 On 17 November 2014 23:52, Gary Gregory wrote: > -- Forwarded message -- > From: Gary Gregory > Date: Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:54 PM > Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.1-RC1 > To: Commons Developers List > > > Hello All: > > This is a VOTE to release Commons CSV 1.1-RC1 a

Re: [VFS][ALL] SVN rollback?

Hi, as far as i know there is a write-through proxy on Apache infra (us/eu) which sometimes has a lack time...which could prouce this kind of messages... But to get a link to your version in jira you could simply use this: http://svn.apache.org/r1640242 which will automatically expanded to

[VFS][ALL] SVN rollback?

Hello, can anybody explain that? C:\ws\asf\commons-vfs2-project>svn commit -m "[VFS-142] Remove instead of null out FileContentThreadData" src\changes\changes.xml core\src\main\java\org\apache\commons\vfs2\provider\DefaultFileContent.java Anmeldebereich: ASF Committer

[GitHub] commons-lang pull request: LANG-701 Added new joinWith method to s...

GitHub user jamessawle opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/38 LANG-701 Added new joinWith method to support varargs ...rom previous join methods, but have added ExpectedException rule to allow for better exception handling in tests You can merge this

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

2 goals actually: - let people test it (you can say what you want excepted for few dev while it is not on central it is not grabbed) - let tomee use a release of jcs 2 instead of the snapshot it depends on For that purpose (mainly first point) a beta is perfect Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau ht

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

It's still not clear to me what your goal is though as you did not answer my question... ;-) Gary On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 12:32 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Well playing with SVN is fine a moment but some projects start to > depend on SNAPSHOT and it can last forever (typically the case for

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

Well playing with SVN is fine a moment but some projects start to depend on SNAPSHOT and it can last forever (typically the case for TomEE since some weeks to not say more). I'll cancel the vote today, not sure I'll be able to reroll it this month so if anyone has some cycles and will of doing it

[CANCEL][VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

This vote is cancelled since procedure was not correct Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-17 18:32 GMT+01:00 Romain Manni-Bucau : > Well playing with SVN is fine a moment but some projects start to > d

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

I see several paths for you. First, cancel the VOTE thread. Second, decide if you want to tell people to grab the latest from SVN and experiment or release an Alpha or Beta. If you want a release, go through the process again... Then publicize the availability of the code in SVN or a release to

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

Basically I just want to release to let people grap it but I don't want to prevent some API changes (so not yet a 2.0). Switched to a RC1 cause of all these commons release links. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibu

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

Let's step back here. Do you want to release an Alpha or Beta? As opposed to a telling people to try out what is in the HEAD of trunk? If you do release 2.0, the implications are strict as to what API changes are allowed WRT binary compatibility. If so you can do that if the JCS community agrees

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

basically that's not what we (I maybe?) wanted to do. this was really a RC (I even wanted to call it beta). So version is correct from this point of view. I sadly didn't notice it was "conflicting" with commons habits. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wo

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

No, the release candidate tag and project version should not match exactly. The tag is a release candidate. What we are voting to produce is version 2.0, so whatever the tag points to should build version 2.0, not 2.0-RC1, not a snapshot, just 2.0. We can have any number of tags 2.0-RC1, 2, 3 and s

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

@Gary: wdym? rc version is RC1 so it matches project version finally. Romain Manni-Bucau @rmannibucau http://www.tomitribe.com http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com https://github.com/rmannibucau 2014-11-17 17:38 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory : > -1 > > The files at the tag are incorrect, least the POM is

Re: [VOTE] (JCS) release [jcs] 2.0-RC1

-1 The files at the tag are incorrect, least the POM is wrong: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/commons/proper/jcs/tags/commons-jcs-2.0-RC1/pom.xml because the project version is 2.0-RC1 instead of 2.0. I've not found one cannonical receipt for releasing out of commons sadly, I use both - https

Jigsaw early-access builds updated (build 38)

Hi Benedikt, JDK 9 Early Access with Project Jigsaw build b38 is available on java.net [1] The goal of Project Jigsaw [2] is to design and implement a standard module system for the Java SE Platform, and to apply that system to the Platform itself and to the JDK. The early-access builds im

[VOTE] Release Commons CSV 1.1-RC1

-- Forwarded message -- From: Gary Gregory Date: Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 9:54 PM Subject: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.1-RC1 To: Commons Developers List Hello All: This is a VOTE to release Commons CSV 1.1-RC1 as 1.1. The Apache Commons CSV library provides a simple interface fo

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.1-RC1

Resent with new subject. G On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Siegfried Goeschl < siegfried.goes...@it20one.com> wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I think there is a copy & pasta error mixing up Commons Exec & Commons CSV > :-) > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 03:54, Gary Gregory wr

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Exec 1.1-RC1

oops! TY! Gary On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:03 AM, Siegfried Goeschl < siegfried.goes...@it20one.com> wrote: > Hi Gary, > > I think there is a copy & pasta error mixing up Commons Exec & Commons CSV > :-) > > Cheers, > > Siegfried Goeschl > > > On 17 Nov 2014, at 03:54, Gary Gregory wrote: > > >