On 2014-11-14, sebb wrote:
> On 12 November 2014 20:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
>> Le 12/11/2014 21:02, bode...@apache.org a écrit :
>>> public int readBits(final int count) throws IOException {
>>> -if (count < 0 || count > 32) {
if (count < 0 || count > 31) {
>>>
Hello,
while working on the leak bugs I did some cleanup to the fields of
DefaultFileManager. I noticed not all get nulled/cleared at close.
Now it should be clean what gets set up and tiered down. However I hope
nobody uses such a scheme: when you close a manager, just throw it away.
I redid th
On 12 November 2014 20:40, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 12/11/2014 21:02, bode...@apache.org a écrit :
>
>> public int readBits(final int count) throws IOException {
>> -if (count < 0 || count > 32) {
>> +if (count < 0 || count > 31) {
>> throw new IllegalArgumentEx
No idea, inheritance from previou sstructure surely
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-11-13 16:58 GMT+01:00 Gary Gregory :
> Why is the xdocs folder not under src/site?
>
> Gary
>
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014
Why is the xdocs folder not under src/site?
Gary
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 4:23 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau
wrote:
> Hi
>
> I'm trying to align on commons standards this time.
>
> - here is the maven repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1061/
> - assemblies can b
Le 13 nov. 2014 10:51, "Johannes Weberhofer" a
écrit :
>
> Dear Romain,
>
> the packages are build nicely at my platform, here is my non-binding +1.
>
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
14:51:28+0100)
> Maven home: /home.local/java/apache-maven-3
> Java ver
Dear Romain,
the packages are build nicely at my platform, here is my non-binding +1.
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19
14:51:28+0100)
Maven home: /home.local/java/apache-maven-3
Java version: 1.7.0_71, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: /usr/lib64/jvm
On 2014-11-13, Damjan Jovanovic wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:51 PM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> One thing BitStream and BitInputStream have in common is what happens
>> when I request more bits than are available from the underlying stream,
>> both will signal an EOF and discard the cached bi
On 2014-11-12, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 12/11/2014 19:51, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
>> A while ago I had already added a guard to ensure nobody tried to read
>> more than 32 bits since bits are accumulated inside an int - but
>> actually we can't do that as readBits returns -1 on EOF, so we can'
