Does a custom annotation at a class level say
@AccessLevel(default=PRIVATE/PROTECTED, final=true/false) that applies to
all the variables declared help reduce the clutter. With this; only few
variables may really require the non-final characteristics. May be a
@NonFinal annotation can help their to
Gary does have a passion for these kinds of changes.
I am definitely +0 on them but Gary has taken the initiative to make the
changes to Log4j and has continually sought to keep them up to date even though
the rest of us don’t really care. We had this same discussion a while ago on
that mailin
Am 27.10.2014 um 02:04 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 3:27 PM, Oliver Heger
> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Am 24.10.2014 um 22:47 schrieb Mark Thomas:
>>> On 24/10/2014 21:17, Oliver Heger wrote:
Am 24.10.2014 um 22:01 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> On Fri, Oct 24, 2014 at 3:2
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:12 AM, Thomas Neidhart
wrote:
> On 10/27/2014 01:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> > Hi All:
> >
> > I plan to push out a Release of Commons Codec 1.10 to push out a new
> > feature and a few fixes.
> >
> > If you want changes, fixes, and tweaks, make 'em ;-)
>
> there is one
2014-10-27 12:32 GMT+01:00 Bruno P. Kinoshita :
> Hi Benedikt!
> > Just let me know if you need help with the bootstraping of the new
> project.
> Yes, please :)
>
I'll give folks some more time to share their thoughts about this and
create the new project then.
>
> > Maybe we should even annou
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 7:40 AM, Thomas Vandahl wrote:
> On 26.10.14 17:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> > Why? I expect them to stay aligned for at least the first year.
>
> I don't expect this. That's just what experience tells me. However, I
> have been wrong before.
>
Keeping versions out of
Thanks Luc! Wasn't aware of that one.
Bruno
From: Luc Maisonobe
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 7:10 AM
Subject: Re: [sandbox] New sandbox component
Le 27/10/2014 08:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> No objections from my site. I think this is a good idea.
Any issue if we keep it like it for the first release at least then
we'll change when the lifecycle will be different Thomas?
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau
2014-10-27 12:40 GMT+01:00 Thomas Vandahl :
> On
On 26.10.14 17:18, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Why? I expect them to stay aligned for at least the first year.
I don't expect this. That's just what experience tells me. However, I
have been wrong before.
Bye, Thomas.
-
To u
Hi Benedikt!
> Just let me know if you need help with the bootstraping of the new project.
Yes, please :)
> Maybe we should even announce this on announce@. There my be other projects
> interested in a library like this (for example Apache Tika [1])
Good idea! Should we drop a note there once th
Le 27/10/2014 08:45, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
> No objections from my site. I think this is a good idea. Just let me know
> if you need help with the bootstraping of the new project. Maybe we should
> even announce this on announce@. There my be other projects interested in a
> library like this (
No objections from my site. I think this is a good idea. Just let me know
if you need help with the bootstraping of the new project. Maybe we should
even announce this on announce@. There my be other projects interested in a
library like this (for example Apache Tika [1])
Benedikt
[1] http://tika
On 10/27/2014 01:52 AM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All:
>
> I plan to push out a Release of Commons Codec 1.10 to push out a new
> feature and a few fixes.
>
> If you want changes, fixes, and tweaks, make 'em ;-)
there is one addition I would like to make, and I will provide a patch
this week.
Th
13 matches
Mail list logo
