Re: [parent]

2014-10-19 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Yes, I think so. What are the changes compared to last apache parent? 2014-10-19 18:39 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory : > Should commons-parent update the the latest Apache POM? > > Gary > > -- > E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org > Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition >

Re: [VFS] CustomRamProviderTest failure

2014-10-19 Thread Schalk Cronjé
Ah yes, I now remember where I've seen it :) I think it should just be committed. It is time we get VFS-2.1 released. On 19/10/2014 20:36, Bernd Eckenfels wrote: Hello, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-521 I think I did not yet commit it, cause I was hoping it gets fixed in the JDK,

Re: [VFS] CustomRamProviderTest failure

2014-10-19 Thread Bernd Eckenfels
Hello, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VFS-521 I think I did not yet commit it, cause I was hoping it gets fixed in the JDK, but it does not look like: https://bugs.openjdk.java.net/browse/JDK-8042377 Gruss Bernd Am Sun, 19 Oct 2014 19:35:39 -0600 schrieb Schalk Cronjé : > When buildi

[VFS] CustomRamProviderTest failure

2014-10-19 Thread Schalk Cronjé
When building from the Git repo of VFS I get the below error. I am sure this was a previous issue that has been fixed. Is the Git repo in sync with the SVN repo? Tests run: 9, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0, Time elapsed: 0.018 sec <<< FAILURE! - in org.apache.commons.vfs2.provider

[parent]

2014-10-19 Thread Gary Gregory
Should commons-parent update the the latest Apache POM? Gary -- E-Mail: garydgreg...@gmail.com | ggreg...@apache.org Java Persistence with Hibernate, Second Edition JUnit in Action, Second Edition Spring Batch in Action

Re: [lang] New compare() methods in LANG-536 pull request match Java source - is this ok?

2014-10-19 Thread Duncan Jones
On 19 October 2014 07:04, Duncan Jones wrote: > On 18 October 2014 06:25, Duncan Jones wrote: >> On 17 October 2014 23:41, James Sawle wrote: >>> How do you create new implementations of such basic functionality that is >>> so explicitly defined within the API? It is like suggesting that we wri

Re: svn commit: r1632886 - in /commons/proper/collections/trunk/src: changes/changes.xml main/java/org/apache/commons/collections4/keyvalue/MultiKey.java

2014-10-19 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 10/19/2014 12:10 PM, brit...@apache.org wrote: > Author: britter > Date: Sun Oct 19 10:10:45 2014 > New Revision: 1632886 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1632886 > Log: > COLLECTIONS-535: Clarify JavaDoc of MultiKey getKey() and size(). This closes > #4 from github. Thanks to Alexander Kjäll >

[GitHub] commons-collections pull request: clarified javadoc for getKey() a...

2014-10-19 Thread asfgit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/commons-collections/pull/4 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if the feat

Re: [lang] Differences in commons-lang (2.x) and commons-lang3 prevent TomEE project from migrating completely (Was: Re: [JCS] release?)

2014-10-19 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Phil summarized it right! But we can stop this thread since maybe tomee will just need to take more 《ownership》 on its deps to tackle it... Le 19 oct. 2014 06:19, "Henri Yandell" a écrit : > On Sat, Oct 18, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Phil Steitz > wrote: > > > On 10/18/14 2:03 PM, Paul Benedict wrote: >