Re: [VOTE] Release Configuration 2.0-alpha1 based on RC1

+1 (Making my vote explicit.) Oliver Am 19.09.2014 um 22:45 schrieb Oliver Heger: > Hi all, > > this is a vote for the first alpha version of [configuration] 2.0 based > on the first release candidate. > > Please note the following points: > - This release is according to the "release often and

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs #39

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

Jenkins build is still unstable: commons-jcs » Apache Commons JCS :: Core #39

See - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@commons.apache.org

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons JCS - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=37169&projectId=286 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Mon 22 Sep 2014 15:20:41 + Finished at: Mon 22 Sep 2014 15:24:18 + Total time: 3m 37s Build Trigger: Sche

Re: [math] migration to git completed

Good idea! Gary On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 9:24 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Le 22/09/2014 15:03, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > > It looks like the title of the commit messages doesn't mention the name > > of the component. It would be nice to add it to help filtering the > > messages by component. > >

Re: [math] Removal of subversion keywords expansion

+1, it's the Git way, so keywords begone. Gary On Mon, Sep 22, 2014 at 8:23 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote: > Hi all, > > Le 22/09/2014 14:07, l...@apache.org a écrit : > > Removed subversion keywords $Id$, $Revision$ and $Date$. > > > > Git does not support subversion keywords expansion. > > > > Proj

Re: [math] migration to git completed

Le 22/09/2014 15:03, Emmanuel Bourg a écrit : > It looks like the title of the commit messages doesn't mention the name > of the component. It would be nice to add it to help filtering the > messages by component. You are right. I have created an issue ticket for this. See

Re: [math] Removal of subversion keywords expansion

Hi Gilles, Le 22/09/2014 14:40, Gilles a écrit : > Hi Luc. > > >> [...] >> >> I am however not sure everyone will be happy with this change, so I >> would like to discuss it with you here. >> > > Is there an alternative to removing SVN keywords? I mean, if they > are now useless, what's the po

Re: [math] migration to git completed

It looks like the title of the commit messages doesn't mention the name of the component. It would be nice to add it to help filtering the messages by component. Emmanuel Bourg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.a

Re: [math] Removal of subversion keywords expansion

Hi Luc. [...] I am however not sure everyone will be happy with this change, so I would like to discuss it with you here. Is there an alternative to removing SVN keywords? I mean, if they are now useless, what's the point of a discussion about keeping them? [I.e. (IIUC) we implicitly agre

Re: [discuss] Vote to git it?

Hi Niall, Le 22/09/2014 14:25, Niall Pemberton a écrit : > On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > >> Le 10/09/2014 11:43, Gilles a écrit : >> >>> This use case does not convince me at all: when working on a feature, >>> you always do it locally (modifying code, preparing unit

Re: [discuss] Vote to git it?

On Wed, Sep 10, 2014 at 10:59 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > Le 10/09/2014 11:43, Gilles a écrit : > > > This use case does not convince me at all: when working on a feature, > > you always do it locally (modifying code, preparing unit tests), and > > SVN certainly does not force you to experiment p

[math] Removal of subversion keywords expansion

Hi all, Le 22/09/2014 14:07, l...@apache.org a écrit : > Removed subversion keywords $Id$, $Revision$ and $Date$. > > Git does not support subversion keywords expansion. > > Project: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons-math/repo > Commit: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/commons

[VOTE][RESULT] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 windows binary package with signed executables

Binding votes +1: markt, bodewig, oheger Non-binding votes +1: ecki This vote therefore passes. I'll start the ball rolling on the actual release. Mark - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org For additional

[JCS] Fwd: [VOTE] a few geronimo-spec alpha-1 artifacts (take2)

We should then be able to use these releases and start a 2.0.0? Any blockers? If noone shouts I'll try to start working on it this week end Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.com/