How should reviewers test this RC?
Gary
Original message From: Oliver Heger
Date:09/20/2014 09:55 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 windows
binary package
with signed executables
+1
Oliver
Am 15.09.2014 u
On 20 September 2014 20:22, Oliver Heger wrote:
> Hi Gary,
>
> thanks for your review.
>
> Am 20.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Gary Gregory:
>> I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do
>> as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM
>> refers
Hi Gary,
thanks for your review.
Am 20.09.2014 um 14:23 schrieb Gary Gregory:
> I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do
> as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM
> refers to a lot of old versions for jars. I would update those (Xer
+1
Oliver
Am 15.09.2014 um 23:05 schrieb Mark Thomas:
> All,
>
> After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a
> version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution
> where the Windows executables have been digitally signed ready for release.
>
> The z
Thank you for keeping commons-configuration rolling Oliver. I'm +1 for
the alpha release, I'll try to post my observations regarding the API in
a separate thread.
Emmanuel Bourg
Le 19/09/2014 22:45, Oliver Heger a écrit :
> Hi all,
>
> this is a vote for the first alpha version of [configuratio
-1 for the missing files from the source archives and the French mix up in
the FB report.
The language in the FindBugs reports can be configured in the plugin config
IIRC. I've seen that done recently but can't recall which project.
Can we do that from commons-parent?
Gary
On Sat, Sep 20, 2014
I do not see any showstoppers for an alpha. The reports include work to do
as expected for an alpha. Importantly the RAT report is clean. The POM
refers to a lot of old versions for jars. I would update those (Xerces
2.6.2? Wow!)
+1
Note that the CI build failed:
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/c
>
>
> > Please review the release candidate and vote.
> > This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now.
> >
> > [ ] +1 Release these artifacts
> > [ ] +0 OK, but...
> > [ ] -0 OK, but really should fix...
> > [X] -1 I oppose this release because...
>
>
What is referenced in the pom
