On 15 September 2014 21:58, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Mon Sep 15 20:58:00 2014
> New Revision: 6522
>
> Log:
> Add hashes and sig
>
> Added:
>
> dev/commons/daemon/binaries/windows/commons-daemon-1.0.15-bin-windows-signed.zip.asc
>(with props)
>
> dev/commons/daemon/binaries/wi
On 15 September 2014 21:41, wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Mon Sep 15 20:41:21 2014
> New Revision: 6521
>
> Log:
> Stage Commons Daemon 1.0.15 with signed windows binaries for voting
>
> Added:
> dev/commons/daemon/
> dev/commons/daemon/binaries/
> dev/commons/daemon/binaries/windows
Hello,
+1 from me, too.
(even when I am not so sure that code signing in OSS projects/upstream
projects is always usefull).
Gruss
Bernd
BTW: at my shop, we use the Eclipse CBI signing plugin (server based).
http://git.eclipse.org/c/cbi/org.eclipse.cbi.maven.plugins.git/about/
Am Mon, 15 Sep 2
On 15/09/2014 22:05, Mark Thomas wrote:
> All,
>
> After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a
> version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution
> where the Windows executables have been digitally signed ready for release.
>
> The zip is identical
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=36814&projectId=72
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 15 Sep 2014 21:20:14 +
Finished at: Mon 15 Sep 2014 21:20:36 +
Total time: 21s
Build Trigger: Schedule
All,
After a few teething problems with the signing service, I now have a
version of the Apache Commons Daemon 1.0.15 Windows binary distribution
where the Windows executables have been digitally signed ready for release.
The zip is identical to this file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/relea
It seems that the continuum build is somehow out of sync with the SVN
repository. The workspace still contains the old configuration package
which has been renamed to configuration2 (now both packages exist).
Does anybody know how to fix this?
Thanks
Oliver
Am 15.09.2014 um 22:20 schrieb Apache
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=36811&projectId=72
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 15 Sep 2014 20:20:18 +
Finished at: Mon 15 Sep 2014 20:20:46 +
Total time: 27s
Build Trigger: Schedule
On 9/15/14 9:02 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
> I'm fine with pushing it off to 2.4, since it doesn't seem like we're
> converging on an obviously preferred implementation.
>
> That said, I'm not too worried about maintaining the per-key iterator, even
> though the key list is dynamic. The eviction pro
I'm fine with pushing it off to 2.4, since it doesn't seem like we're
converging on an obviously preferred implementation.
That said, I'm not too worried about maintaining the per-key iterator, even
though the key list is dynamic. The eviction process already maintains its
own list of keys, which
On 9/11/14 11:39 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
> On 9/11/14 8:55 AM, Phil Steitz wrote:
>> On 9/9/14 11:38 AM, Michael Berman wrote:
>>> Great, thanks! I have all the new config property boilerplate in place and
>>> I understand how it should work, but I'm debating the best way to implement
>>> the per-ke
11 matches
Mail list logo