Re: svn commit: r1621584 - /commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/security.xml

2014-09-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-09-02, sebb wrote: >> Propchange: commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/security.xml >> -- >> svn:mime-type = application/xml > -1 (for the property) > SVN treats that mime-type as binary; either drop it or us

Re: svn commit: r1621584 - /commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/security.xml

2014-09-01 Thread sebb
On 31 August 2014 11:42, wrote: > Author: bodewig > Date: Sun Aug 31 10:42:53 2014 > New Revision: 1621584 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1621584 > Log: > CMS commit to commons by bodewig > > Added: > commons/cms-site/trunk/content/xdoc/security.xml (with props) > Added: commons/cms-site/

Re: svn commit: r1621831 - /commons/proper/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml2/model/Action.java

2014-09-01 Thread sebb
On 1 September 2014 16:44, wrote: > Author: ate > Date: Mon Sep 1 15:44:30 2014 > New Revision: 1621831 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1621831 > Log: > reverting and correcting previous fix to prevent NPEs which introduced an > incorrect side-effect There should really be a unit test that fai

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons SCXML - Apache Commons (Test build with Java 1.7)

2014-09-01 Thread Apache Continuum
Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=36084&projectId=101 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Mon 1 Sep 2014 16:20:38 + Finished at: Mon 1 Sep 2014 16:26:09 + Total time: 5m 30s Build Trigger: Schedule

Re: svn commit: r1602784 - /commons/proper/scxml/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/scxml2/model/Action.java

2014-09-01 Thread Ate Douma
Dave, Thanks for detecting and fixing the potential NPE below, much appreciated! But your fix had a potential functional side-effect, which I now fixed in http://svn.apache.org/r1621831 Maybe it would be good if you (or whoever) applies such micro fixes to also send a heads-up to the dev@ lis

Re: Top Level Security Page

2014-09-01 Thread Stefan Bodewig
On 2014-09-01, sebb wrote: > On 1 September 2014 04:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote: >> On 2014-09-01, sebb wrote: >>> The page mentions denial of service - not sure that applies to any of >>> the Commons components? >> The one issue with Compress could be used for a DoS attack. > I think that would

Re: [dbutils] OUT parameters for stored procedures (DBUTILS-50, DBUTILS-104)

2014-09-01 Thread Raymond DeCampo
Sorry, somehow I managed to send the message before I finished typing it up. In any case, CallableStatementHandler would extend ResultSetHandler and be used in a similar fashion. There would be methods for registering the OUT parameters and then retrieving their values. Then I would add methods

[dbutils] OUT parameters for stored procedures (DBUTILS-50, DBUTILS-104)

2014-09-01 Thread Raymond DeCampo
I was hoping to contribute a solution to these issues for the dbutils project. If I am not mistaken, DBUTILS-104 is a duplicate of DBUTILS-50. Both request means of running stored procedures and retrieving the values of OUT parameters. At first I only noticed DBUTILS-104 and started coding up a

Re: Top Level Security Page

2014-09-01 Thread sebb
On 1 September 2014 04:53, Stefan Bodewig wrote: > On 2014-09-01, sebb wrote: > >> Might be useful to add a link to the security page under "General >> Information". > > Right. > > >> The page mentions denial of service - not sure that applies to any of >> the Commons components? > > The one issue