Re: [BCEL] Trying a release?

2014-08-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
I've uploaded the current site of BCEL to my apache space: http://people.apache.org/~britter/bcel-6.0-SNAPSHOT/ We have 12 clirr errors, because some methods have been added to the org.apache.bcel.classfile.Visitor interface. Since we already bumped the major version number vom 5 to 6, since seems

[BCEL] Trying a release?

2014-08-21 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi guys, several projects are waiting for a Java 8 compatible BCEL release and since nobody else seems to have the time to do it, I'll have a look at it this weekend. Please let me know if you see anything that needs fixing. Benedikt -- http://people.apache.org/~britter/ http://www.systemoutpri

Re: svn commit: r1619123 - in /commons/proper: jelly/trunk/pom.xml proxy/trunk/pom.xml

2014-08-21 Thread Olivier Lamy
On 21 August 2014 01:02, wrote: > Author: sebb > Date: Wed Aug 20 15:02:31 2014 > New Revision: 1619123 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1619123 > Log: > Fix up URLs > > Modified: > commons/proper/jelly/trunk/pom.xml > commons/proper/proxy/trunk/pom.xml > > Modified: commons/proper/jelly/t

Re: svn commit: r1619091 - /commons/proper/daemon/branches/1.0.x/pom.xml

2014-08-21 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Le 21/08/2014 01:00, sebb a écrit : > No, because the short URLs don't work properly in all the links. What do you mean by "don't work properly" ? http://commons.apache.org/daemon works fine and redirects to the long URL (for now). Emmanuel Bourg

Re: [JCS] Rework logging

2014-08-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I did ;) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-658 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LOG4J2-788 didn't create one for PropertyConfigurator since it is surely something to get rid of in near future (i reused tomee log4j1 integration but we need to do a log4j2 integration) Romain Mann

Re: [JCS] Rework logging

2014-08-21 Thread Gary Gregory
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 3:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2014-08-21 21:15 GMT+02:00 Christian Grobmeier : > > On 20 Aug 2014, at 15:47, sebb wrote: > > > >> On 20 August 2014 14:37, Gary Gregory wrote: > >>> > >>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: > >>> > On 20 August 2014 1

Re: [JCS] Rework logging

2014-08-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I think I already said it but logging threads are endless in general. Only solutions making sense are: 1) have a little facade in the project 2) reuse a facade Issue with 2 is: which one? log4j2 seems the right one long term but I think it is too early since most of the time today it will not be

Re: [JCS] Rework logging

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
Romain, On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > 2014-08-21 21:15 GMT+02:00 Christian Grobmeier : > Not adding a dependency for one line answer. > > For longer one: take tomee example: we have [logging], slf4j cause of > dependencies but as soon as we'll be able we'll drop the

Re: [JCS] Rework logging

2014-08-21 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-08-21 21:15 GMT+02:00 Christian Grobmeier : > On 20 Aug 2014, at 15:47, sebb wrote: > >> On 20 August 2014 14:37, Gary Gregory wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: >>> On 20 August 2014 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote: > > Moving discussion about logging from [

Re: [JCS] Rework logging

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On 20 Aug 2014, at 15:47, sebb wrote: On 20 August 2014 14:37, Gary Gregory wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: On 20 August 2014 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote: Moving discussion about logging from [JCS-122] to this dev ML. Why not use Log4j 2, uses can redirect logging to ot

Re: [JCS] Rework logging

2014-08-21 Thread Christian Grobmeier
On 20 Aug 2014, at 19:35, Thomas Vandahl wrote: On 20.08.14 15:37, Gary Gregory wrote: On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:28 AM, sebb wrote: On 20 August 2014 14:04, Gary Gregory wrote: Moving discussion about logging from [JCS-122] to this dev ML. Why not use Log4j 2, uses can redirect logging to

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Migrate Commons Math to Git

2014-08-21 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi all, The migration is scheduled to Sunday. Here is the comment made by Danile Gruno from infra about this (see ). > I will begin the transition towards Git on Sunday, as that is the > least busy day for commits in general. > The following st

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons Codec - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

2014-08-21 Thread Apache Continuum
Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=36021&projectId=70 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Thu 21 Aug 2014 07:20:08 + Finished at: Thu 21 Aug 2014 07:24:54 + Total time: 4m 45s Build Trigger: Schedule