Re: release vs. SNAPSHOT sites.

On 27/07/2014 15:15, Phil Steitz wrote: > On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:24 AM, sebb wrote: > >> On 26 July 2014 19:09, Phil Steitz wrote: >>> >>> On Jul 26, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Gary Gregory >> wrote: OK, so do we want: - Always have the release site be the "main" site. -

Re: [VFS] Implementing custom hdfs file system using commons-vfs 2.0

Hello Peter, I would suggest you use the current Version from CVS or the snapshot builds. This would have the big advantage that you can actually test and contribute to this version in case you miss some features or find some bugs. If you want to implement your own file system provider, you typic

Re: [VFS][Site] Broken VFS Site

Hello, the links on VFS to the sub-projets are still broken. Should I file a JIRA or who can fix this? Gruss Bernd Am Mon, 19 May 2014 00:11:16 +0200 schrieb Bernd Eckenfels : > Hello, > > has anybody an idea where the component sites of commons-vfs2 went to? > I am quite sure I visited the pa

Re: release vs. SNAPSHOT sites.

On Sun, Jul 27, 2014 at 4:24 AM, sebb wrote: > On 26 July 2014 19:09, Phil Steitz wrote: > > > > > >> On Jul 26, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Gary Gregory > wrote: > >> > >> OK, so do we want: > >> > >> - Always have the release site be the "main" site. > >> - Optionally have a separate SNAPSHOT site. > >

Re: release vs. SNAPSHOT sites.

On 26 July 2014 19:09, Phil Steitz wrote: > > >> On Jul 26, 2014, at 6:16 AM, Gary Gregory wrote: >> >> OK, so do we want: >> >> - Always have the release site be the "main" site. >> - Optionally have a separate SNAPSHOT site. >> >> Do we put this magic in commons-parent? > > I prefer the opposit

Re: [ALL] Clirr doesn't work with Java 8 (and it seems to be our fault ;-)

Okay, I'm not a developer of BCEL, so I don't know. :o) Do you have the time to push a release out? B 2014-07-27 12:35 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg : > Because it's a major released with many new features, it deserves a > version bump. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > On July 27, 2014 12:08:55 PM CEST, Be

Re: [ALL] Clirr doesn't work with Java 8 (and it seems to be our fault ;-)

Because it's a major released with many new features, it deserves a version bump. Emmanuel Bourg On July 27, 2014 12:08:55 PM CEST, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >Hi Emmanuel, > >why do we release it as BCEL 6 if it's binary compatible? > >Benedikt > > >2014-07-27 11:59 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg : > >

Re: [ALL] Clirr doesn't work with Java 8 (and it seems to be our fault ;-)

Hi Emmanuel, why do we release it as BCEL 6 if it's binary compatible? Benedikt 2014-07-27 11:59 GMT+02:00 Emmanuel Bourg : > BCEL 6 is ready to be released and it is binary compatible, that will fix > clirr. I'll prepare the vote this week. > > Emmanuel Bourg > > > On July 27, 2014 10:18:51 A

Re: [ALL] Clirr doesn't work with Java 8 (and it seems to be our fault ;-)

BCEL 6 is ready to be released and it is binary compatible, that will fix clirr. I'll prepare the vote this week. Emmanuel Bourg On July 27, 2014 10:18:51 AM CEST, Benedikt Ritter wrote: >Thanks for the pointer. How do you feel about pushing out a 5.3 that >only >contains the Java 8 fixes? > >

[VFS] Implementing custom hdfs file system using commons-vfs 2.0

Hi, I am evaluating commons-vfs 2.0 for one of my use cases. I read that commons--vfs 2.1 has a file system implementation for HDFS. Since commons-vfs 2.1 is still in development and commons-vfs 2.1 does not have all capabilities that we require for hdfs, I would like to implement a custom file sy

Re: [ALL] Clirr doesn't work with Java 8 (and it seems to be our fault ;-)

Thanks for the pointer. How do you feel about pushing out a 5.3 that only contains the Java 8 fixes? B 2014-07-26 15:14 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory : > I think the trunk handles some or all of Java 8 now. See BCEL-174, > BCEL-175. > > Gary > > > On Sat, Jul 26, 2014 at 6:43 AM, Benedikt Ritter > wr