On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 09:52:12 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/14, 9:33 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Sat, 12 Jul 2014 06:54:46 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 7/12/14, 6:19 AM, Gilles wrote:
On Fri, 20 Jun 2014 14:52:22 -0700, Phil Steitz wrote:
On 6/20/14, 9:56 AM, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 06/20/2014
Le 13/07/2014 14:01, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> I do not think we should bother with Java 5.
>
> For me the discussion should be whether we require Java 6 or 7.
+1 for Java 7
Emmanuel Bourg
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr
Thank you so much Thomas.
Regards
Dipanjan
On Sunday, 13 July 2014, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
> On 07/13/2014 04:29 PM, Dipanjan Laha wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I checked in some code yesterday in commons collection. This triggered a
> > build which failed. The log around the failure reads
> >
> >
On 7/13/14, 2:40 AM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Le 01/07/2014 08:52, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
>> Le 30/06/2014 22:00, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>>> On 6/30/14, 12:33 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
Le 30/06/2014 19:15, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Gilles
>> wrote:
On 07/13/2014 04:29 PM, Dipanjan Laha wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I checked in some code yesterday in commons collection. This triggered a
> build which failed. The log around the failure reads
>
> [commons-collections] $ /home/hudson/tools/java/latest1.5/bin/java -cp
> /home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven3
Hello,
I checked in some code yesterday in commons collection. This triggered a
build which failed. The log around the failure reads
[commons-collections] $ /home/hudson/tools/java/latest1.5/bin/java -cp
/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/maven3-agent.jar:/home/jenkins/jenkins-slave/tools/hudson.tasks.M
I do not think we should bother with Java 5.
For me the discussion should be whether we require Java 6 or 7.
Gary
Original message From: Adrian Crum
Date:07/13/2014 05:27
(GMT-05:00) To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [CANCEL][VOTE] Release Commons CSV 1.0 based on
I would be inclined to leave Java 5 compatibility to the few (if any)
people who still use it. They have access to the CSV source code and
they can modify it to make it Java 5 compatible.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 7/13/2014 10:30 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2
Github user AlexYursha closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/commons-lang/pull/28
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
2014-07-12 3:17 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> +1
>
> Apache Maven 3.2.2 (45f7c06d68e745d05611f7fd14efb6594181933e;
> 2014-06-17T09:51:42-04:00)
> Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.2.2
> Java version: 1.7.0_60, vendor: Oracle Corporation
> Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_60\jre
> Default lo
Hi all,
Le 01/07/2014 08:52, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
> Le 30/06/2014 22:00, Phil Steitz a écrit :
>> On 6/30/14, 12:33 PM, Luc Maisonobe wrote:
>>> Le 30/06/2014 19:15, Phil Steitz a écrit :
> On Jun 30, 2014, at 9:59 AM, Gilles
> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Jun 2014 09:08:00 -0700
Hi,
it looks like the JavaScript part of [VALIDATOR] is really out dated. We
have a pull request at github that suggests deprecating it all together
[1]. Merging this PR will log a warning to the console when the JavaScript
is loaded, pointing users to an alternative.
Are there any objections aga
2014-07-13 11:27 GMT+02:00 Adrian Crum :
> Why would we target Java 5? It is long past end-of-life.
Well I don't have a strong preference here. The reason people bring up for
targeting older Java versions is, to reach a broader user group. I'm fine
with targeting Java 7.
>
>
> Adrian Crum
> Sa
Why would we target Java 5? It is long past end-of-life.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 7/13/2014 10:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
Hi all,
this vote it canceled to address the various issues identified. I'll need
some time to work through the list, so I expect the
Hi all,
this vote it canceled to address the various issues identified. I'll need
some time to work through the list, so I expect the next RC by mid of the
week (help is always welcome ;-).
Till then I'd like to hear comments regarding the Java version to target.
>From what I've seen it looks lik
15 matches
Mail list logo
