Thank you for the update.
See you tomorrow then.
Gary
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:26 PM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I've updated trunk and created the RC tag. currently I'm unable to deploy
> to nexus, probably because my environment isn't configured correctly. I'll
> have to dig into tha
Hi.
I've updated trunk and created the RC tag. currently I'm unable to deploy
to nexus, probably because my environment isn't configured correctly. I'll
have to dig into that tomorrow. Hopefully I'll be able to populate the
staging repo then :-)
Good night!
Benedikt
--
http://people.apache.org/
I'm going to cut an RC ASAP.
2014-07-10 16:38 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> I think we can document what we have now and what our possible road map is.
>
> Let's cut an RC and see what happens.
>
> Are you up for RM'ing?
>
> Gary
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
>
GitHub user bripkens opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/commons-validator/pull/1
Deprecate the JS part of commons validator
The JS parts of commons-validator haven't been updated in a while and don't
necessarily follow common security best practices (almost every funct
I think we can document what we have now and what our possible road map is.
Let's cut an RC and see what happens.
Are you up for RM'ing?
Gary
On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 4:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-07-09 4:15 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
>
> > We do have a discrepancy between our format c
I agree that we should stop worrying about edge cases and release a
version that covers the majority of needs.
Adrian Crum
Sandglass Software
www.sandglass-software.com
On 7/10/2014 9:12 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
2014-07-09 4:15 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
We do have a discrepancy between our
2014-07-09 4:15 GMT+02:00 Gary Gregory :
> We do have a discrepancy between our format class and lexer (which is
> hardwired with CR & LF).
>
> Ideally, it seems the lexer should pickup it's set of EOL Strings from the
> format.
>
> I recall reading worries of performance issues changing this but