Re: svn commit: r1603607 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2014-06-18 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 06/18/2014 10:53 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Thomas Neidhart > wrote: > >> On 06/18/2014 09:54 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote: >>> Author: ggregory >>> Date: Wed Jun 18 19:54:52 2014 >>> New Revision: 1603607 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1603607 >>> Log: >>

Re: svn commit: r1603607 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2014-06-18 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:51 PM, Thomas Neidhart wrote: > On 06/18/2014 09:54 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote: > > Author: ggregory > > Date: Wed Jun 18 19:54:52 2014 > > New Revision: 1603607 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1603607 > > Log: > > [CODEC-187] Beider Morse Phonetic Matching produc

Re: svn commit: r1603607 - /commons/proper/codec/trunk/NOTICE.txt

2014-06-18 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On 06/18/2014 09:54 PM, ggreg...@apache.org wrote: > Author: ggregory > Date: Wed Jun 18 19:54:52 2014 > New Revision: 1603607 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1603607 > Log: > [CODEC-187] Beider Morse Phonetic Matching producing incorrect tokens. > > Modified: > commons/proper/codec/trunk/NOT

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/06/2014 20:28, venkatesha m a écrit : > Hi Luc, Gilles Hi Venkat > > First of, Iam immensly thankful to all your comments on this patch. > Next, i am attaching my new patch with today's date(18-jun). However > please advise if i need to remove the old patch file if it confuses. OK, I'll r

Re: [MATH] Introduce Lombok annotations into apache commons

2014-06-18 Thread Matt Benson
Lombok depends on a particular compiler, etc. Commons [weaver] provides a foundation for recreating anything that lombok does, AFAIK. Matt On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 2:40 PM, venkatesha m wrote: > Hi, > > I would like to understand if there are any concerns regarding introducing > annotation libr

[MATH] Introduce Lombok annotations into apache commons

2014-06-18 Thread venkatesha m
Hi, I would like to understand if there are any concerns regarding introducing annotation libraries such as lombok(http://projectlombok.org/) to commons-math . The most advantages i have seen using it are as follows: a) A majority of code drudge such as equals, hashcode, getter and setter can be

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons Codec - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

2014-06-18 Thread Apache Continuum
Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=32663&projectId=70 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Ok Started at: Wed 18 Jun 2014 19:20:12 + Finished at: Wed 18 Jun 2014 19:21:05 + Total time: 53s Build Trigger: Schedule B

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread venkatesha m
Hi Luc, Gilles First of, Iam immensly thankful to all your comments on this patch. Next, i am attaching my new patch with today's date(18-jun). However please advise if i need to remove the old patch file if it confuses. Please find my response below. The new patch has the suggested changes in

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 16:39:12 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Hi Gilles and Venkat, Le 18/06/2014 15:40, Gilles a écrit : On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : Hello Luc. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem

Re: [Math] MATH-1129 and Re: [MATH-1120] Needed opinion about support on variations in, percentile calculation

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Hi Gilles and Venkat, Le 18/06/2014 15:40, Gilles a écrit : > On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: >> Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : >>> Hello Luc. >>> > > See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 > > The problem reported was due to the

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
On Wed, 18 Jun 2014 15:02:41 +0200, Luc Maisonobe wrote: Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : Hello Luc. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving correctly in the presence of NaN. This procedure could be replace

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/06/2014 14:32, Gilles a écrit : > Hello Luc. > >>> >>> See >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 >>> >>> The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving >>> correctly in the presence of NaN. >>> This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
Hello Luc. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving correctly in the presence of NaN. This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from the JDK: java.util.Arrays.sort(double[],int,int) Any objectio

Re: [Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Luc Maisonobe
Le 18/06/2014 13:37, Gilles a écrit : > Hi. Hi Gilles, > > See > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 > > The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving > correctly in the presence of NaN. > This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from the JDK:

[Math] MATH-1129

2014-06-18 Thread Gilles
Hi. See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-1129 The problem reported was due to the sorting procedure not behaving correctly in the presence of NaN. This procedure could be replaced by an equivalent method from the JDK: java.util.Arrays.sort(double[],int,int) Any objection? Regard