Excellent point on the release notes, Oliver. Consider this vote cancelled.
Matt
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:55 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Build works fine for me with the following configuration:
> $ mvn --version
> Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
> 2013-02-19 14:51
Nice work!
Send from my mobile device
> Am 04.06.2014 um 17:41 schrieb Gary Gregory :
>
> Hi All,
>
> It's that time again.
>
> Please provide feedback for our Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014,
> provided below.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
> -
>
> Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014
>
Build works fine for me with the following configuration:
$ mvn --version
Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da;
2013-02-19 14:51:28+0100)
Maven home: c:\data\dev\tools\apache-maven-3.0.5
Java version: 1.7.0_55, vendor: Oracle Corporation
Java home: c:\Program Files\Java\jdk
Good
idea:
file:///windows/dev/oss/asf/commons/weaver-1.1-rc1/target/staging/building.html
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 2:19 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Then we need to state in a BUILDING.txt what versions of what are known
> good build setups.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message From: Mat
Then we need to state in a BUILDING.txt what versions of what are known good
build setups.
Gary
Original message From: Matt Benson
Date:06/05/2014 14:27 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.1 based on RC1
Hi Phil,
Hi Phil,
Unfortunately [weaver] is beset by
http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MNG-5601 . I *could* modify it such that
v1.0 of commons-weaver-build-tools is used for the checkstyle/PMD/findbugs
settings, but it strikes me that this is counterintuitive. It might be
feasible to extract this to a prop
I can't build this without installing a new old version of Maven
(seems to require [3.0.0,3.2.0)). Is there a workaround to get the
build to work on either 3.2 or 2.2 (the two I already have
installed)? Or is there a way to build the code using Ant? I don't
care about the site issues, but I need
Yeah, well, multi-module sites is not something easy to get right in Maven
IMO. This site in an example because it seems to have three levels and it
is hard to navigate.
When I look at the page:
https://people.apache.org/~mbenson/commons-weaver-1.1-rc1/index.html
how do I find the modules? I hav
During the vote for the 1.0 release, one of your complaints that led to
your -1 was that "finding the modules requires drilling down on the site."
I took this to mean you did not find the modules link helpful and therefore
removed it in favor of direct and explicit text in the project overview.
Per
Le 05/06/2014 16:04, Gary Gregory a écrit :
> Something went wrong with the code coverage, your site shows 0% for every
> class.
For some reason the test fails during the code coverage run with 'mvn site'.
> How about adding PMD, FindBugs and Checkstyle?
>
> We would not have to fix everything
How do I find these modules from the main site? I expect to see them in the
left hand side menu.
Gary
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Matt Benson wrote:
> As this is a multimodule component, report content tends to be more correct
> when relegated to the module level. Please see:
>
>
> http://
Something went wrong with the code coverage, your site shows 0% for every
class.
How about adding PMD, FindBugs and Checkstyle?
We would not have to fix everything but it would be informative.
Gary
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 9:01 AM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm preparing the 6.0 rele
Personally I'm on the fence on this subject, but I will reiterate that the
point is moot in this context.
At this point I will attempt to steer this thread back on course by adding
my own +1 to the release.
Matt
On Jun 5, 2014 12:44 AM, "Romain Manni-Bucau" wrote:
> Age doesnt for sure, user nu
Hi all,
I'm preparing the 6.0 release for BCEL and I think it's ready for a
vote. Before I stage the artifacts and start the tag dance could you
please review the content of this release? If everything is fine I'll
call for a vote in another thread.
Here are the artifacts and the site I built fro
+1
Thomas
On Wed, Jun 4, 2014 at 5:41 PM, Gary Gregory wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> It's that time again.
>
> Please provide feedback for our Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014,
> provided below.
>
> Thank you,
> Gary
> -
>
> Apache Commons Board Report, June 4 2014
>
> The Apache Commons projec
15 matches
Mail list logo
