Re: svn commit: r1594073 - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs: auxiliary/remote/server/ engine/memory/ engine/memory/util/

2014-05-28 Thread Phil Steitz
On 5/28/14, 4:47 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > I'm convinced of it (why the comment was this way). I'll try to rework it > this week based on the LockFactory we spoke about in another thread. Great. Would would be good to explain when implementing these changes is: 0) what sequences of operati

Re: svn commit: r1598071 - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs: auxiliary/disk/ engine/control/ engine/memory/ utils/logger/ utils/struct/

2014-05-28 Thread sebb
On 28 May 2014 18:06, wrote: > Author: rmannibucau > Date: Wed May 28 17:06:12 2014 > New Revision: 1598071 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1598071 > Log: > using reentrant locks instead of old synchronized -1 This commit mixes two completely different changes: - re-entrant locks - addition of

[beanutils] 1.8.4 issues in JIRA

2014-05-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
Hi, JIRA has several bugs marked as fixed in beanutils 1.8.4 but this version was never released. Is it correct to assume they were fixed in 1.9.0? https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310460&version=12314869 Emmanuel Bourg -

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on RC1

2014-05-28 Thread Gary Gregory
+1. Builds OK on: Apache Maven 3.0.5 (r01de14724cdef164cd33c7c8c2fe155faf9602da; 2013-02-19 08:51:28-0500) Maven home: C:\Java\apache-maven-3.0.5 Java version: 1.7.0_55, vendor: Oracle Corporation Java home: C:\Program Files\Java\jdk1.7.0_55\jre Default locale: en_US, platform encoding: Cp1252 OS

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on RC1

2014-05-28 Thread Gary Gregory
On Wed, May 28, 2014 at 3:58 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > Hi Gary, > > Am 28.05.2014 01:33, schrieb Gary Gregory: > > How about adding FindBugs and PMD reports for the next go around? > > agreed, this would be good. However, please keep in mind that > [beanutils] is currently in pure maintenance mode

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on RC1

2014-05-28 Thread Oliver Heger
Hi Gary, Am 28.05.2014 01:33, schrieb Gary Gregory: > How about adding FindBugs and PMD reports for the next go around? agreed, this would be good. However, please keep in mind that [beanutils] is currently in pure maintenance mode. I do what I think is necessary and don't have the ambitions to p

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons JCS - Apache Commons ()

2014-05-28 Thread Apache Continuum
Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=31538&projectId=286 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 28 May 2014 18:00:05 + Finished at: Wed 28 May 2014 18:04:43 + Total time: 4m 38s Build Trigger: Sche

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons JCS - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

2014-05-28 Thread Apache Continuum
Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=31537&projectId=286 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Wed 28 May 2014 17:20:43 + Finished at: Wed 28 May 2014 17:24:36 + Total time: 3m 52s Build Trigger: Sche

[JCS] log from info to debug in dispose

2014-05-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Hi any objection to use debug level for first log message in org.apache.commons.jcs.engine.control.CompositeCache#dispose(boolean)? It prints something like: mai 28, 2014 7:13:02 PM org.apache.commons.jcs.engine.control.CompositeCache dispose Infos: In DISPOSE, [javax.cache.expiry.ExpiryPolicyTe

Re: [jcs] Ceanup and reorganize the project, was:Re: [VETO] Re: [jcs] What's next?

2014-05-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
Found an IBM article showing globally what I experimented: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp10264/ So I'll first add ReentrantLock where synchronized was used, then bench it again and see depending performances if we need the LockFactory abstraction or not. Does it work for you

Re: [jcs] Ceanup and reorganize the project, was:Re: [VETO] Re: [jcs] What's next?

2014-05-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
2014-05-27 21:13 GMT+02:00 Thomas Vandahl : > On 26.05.14 22:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > > the point is putIfAbsent is costly but globally once (can be done > > concurrently but this is ignorable at runtime). Only important thing is > to > > ensure then the system uses a single instance. > > R

Re: svn commit: r1594073 - in /commons/proper/jcs/trunk/commons-jcs-core/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/jcs: auxiliary/remote/server/ engine/memory/ engine/memory/util/

2014-05-28 Thread Romain Manni-Bucau
I'm convinced of it (why the comment was this way). I'll try to rework it this week based on the LockFactory we spoke about in another thread. Romain Manni-Bucau Twitter: @rmannibucau Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau Github: https://github.c

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on RC1

2014-05-28 Thread Emmanuel Bourg
+1 Checked with OpenJDK 7 and 8 on Debian Emmanuel Bourg Le 26/05/2014 21:39, Oliver Heger a écrit : > This is a vote to release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on the first RC. > There was a fix related to a security issue which should now be made > available. > > BeanUtils 1.9.2 RC1 is availab

Re: [VOTE] Release BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on RC1

2014-05-28 Thread Thomas Neidhart
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 9:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote: > This is a vote to release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on the first RC. > There was a fix related to a security issue which should now be made > available. > > BeanUtils 1.9.2 RC1 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/re