On 5/26/14, 12:39 PM, Oliver Heger wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on the first RC.
> There was a fix related to a security issue which should now be made
> available.
>
> BeanUtils 1.9.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev
On 5/27/14, 11:17 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Send from my mobile device
>
>> Am 13.05.2014 um 20:53 schrieb Phil Steitz :
>>
>>> On 5/12/14, 12:46 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
>>> Author: rmannibucau
>>> Date: Mon May 12 19:46:08 2014
>>> New Revision: 1594073
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apach
How about adding FindBugs and PMD reports for the next go around?
Gary
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on the first RC.
> There was a fix related to a security issue which should now be made
> available.
>
> BeanUtil
The build fails on Java 8 because of Javadoc issues.
Gary
On Mon, May 26, 2014 at 3:39 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> This is a vote to release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on the first RC.
> There was a fix related to a security issue which should now be made
> available.
>
> BeanUtils 1.9.2 RC1 i
On 26.05.14 21:53, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Globally agree
>
> Next question is: do we plan a 2.0.0-alpha without it (said otherwise I'd
> like JCache to be out ASAP and avoid what we live @BVal taking soon 1 year
> to release) or do we wait to be very stable to do a proper 2.0.0?
My primary g
On 26.05.14 22:05, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> the point is putIfAbsent is costly but globally once (can be done
> concurrently but this is ignorable at runtime). Only important thing is to
> ensure then the system uses a single instance.
Right, but what if the instance creates a file, socket or s
On 5/27/14, 11:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
> Send from my mobile device
>
>> Am 16.05.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Luc Maisonobe :
>>
>> Hi Benedikt,
>>
>> Le 16/05/2014 09:09, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>>> Hi Luc
>>>
>>>
>>> 2014-05-15 0:17 GMT+02:00 Luc Maisonobe :
>>>
Le 14/05/2014 20:18, Luc
Send from my mobile device
> Am 13.05.2014 um 20:53 schrieb Phil Steitz :
>
>> On 5/12/14, 12:46 PM, rmannibu...@apache.org wrote:
>> Author: rmannibucau
>> Date: Mon May 12 19:46:08 2014
>> New Revision: 1594073
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1594073
>> Log:
>> removing a bunch of synchron
Send from my mobile device
> Am 16.05.2014 um 18:45 schrieb Luc Maisonobe :
>
> Hi Benedikt,
>
> Le 16/05/2014 09:09, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>> Hi Luc
>>
>>
>> 2014-05-15 0:17 GMT+02:00 Luc Maisonobe :
>>
>>> Le 14/05/2014 20:18, Luc Maisonobe a écrit :
Le 11/05/2014 11:55, Luc Mais
that is what I did for vfs-smb at codehaus mojo. But the MOJO dev does not
like this idea since commons-vfs should take care of this :-)
Now if commons-vfs completely remove its smb provider, than I have a good
reason to release at codehaus
-D
On Tue, May 27, 2014 at 6:32 AM, Schalk Cronj é
Hi Oliver,
2014-05-26 21:39 GMT+02:00 Oliver Heger :
> This is a vote to release Commons BeanUtils 1.9.2 based on the first RC.
> There was a fix related to a security issue which should now be made
> available.
>
> BeanUtils 1.9.2 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/
Would it be a better solution to rather create a CIFS provider outside
of apache-commons (and outside of ASF), which then needs to be
downloaded separately?
The VFS website can have a list of known external providers.
This will remove the onus from commons developers to maintain the CIFS
code
12 matches
Mail list logo
