On 19 March 2014 21:57, Matt Benson wrote:
> It's not really lost, is it? It can easily be restored. When I do so,
> will you withdraw your -1?
It so happens that the doap is referenced by projects.a.o so it is
obvious when it disappears from its original SVN location.
I have no idea whether any
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=28381&projectId=100
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Wed 19 Mar 2014 23:20:51 +
Finished at: Wed 19 Mar 2014 23:21:03 +
Total time: 12s
Build Trigger: Schedul
It's not really lost, is it? It can easily be restored. When I do so,
will you withdraw your -1?
Matt
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 4:44 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 19 March 2014 18:30, wrote:
>> Author: mbenson
>> Date: Wed Mar 19 18:30:46 2014
>> New Revision: 1579340
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r15
On 19 March 2014 18:30, wrote:
> Author: mbenson
> Date: Wed Mar 19 18:30:46 2014
> New Revision: 1579340
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1579340
> Log:
> make 2.0 branch into trunk
>
> Added:
> commons/proper/proxy/trunk/
> - copied from r1579339, commons/proper/proxy/branches/version-
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=28380&projectId=100
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Ok
Started at: Wed 19 Mar 2014 19:28:31 +
Finished at: Wed 19 Mar 2014 19:28:47 +
Total time: 16s
Build Trigger: Schedule
Good news to see some action there again.
Gary
Original message
From: Matt Benson
Date:03/19/2014 10:49 (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@commons.apache.org
Subject: [proxy] toward a 2.0 release
Bill Speirs and I were talking offline and we'd like to (finally) move
forward with the ne
Bill Speirs and I were talking offline and we'd like to (finally) move
forward with the next version of the [proxy] component. We hope to add
another feature or so, polish up the website and release in the coming
weeks. Please take this email as the prelude to the official release
proposal and feel
