Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 RC3 is available for review at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/weaver/ (r4624).
Maven artifacts are at:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1018/
.
Tested with Oracle JDKs 6, 7 and 8.
The Subversion tag is:
http://s
+1
builds for from source with my compiler zoo (incl. Java 8 - build 120).
Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I talked about cutting Compress 1.8 in particular because of
> COMPRESS-264 but delayed it waiting for a new XZ for Java release.
>
> Compress 1.8 RC1 is available for review here:
+1
Tested with Java 7 64-bit on Windows 7 from src zip file, MD5 and sig OK.
Not a blocked: Java 8 fails due to at least one Javadoc error.
Gary
On Sun, Mar 9, 2014 at 3:52 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
> Hi all
>
> I talked about cutting Compress 1.8 in particular because of
> COMPRESS-264 but
Hello Ate,
it's great to see how you're pushing things forward.
Many thanks!
Benedikt
2014-03-11 13:21 GMT+01:00 Ate Douma :
> SCXML developers,
>
> I've just created a first Commons SCXML 2.0-M0 milestone tag as baseline
> for the roadmap [1] towards Commons SCXML 2.0.
> Please read the roadm
People seem to be okay with this. An example of how the site build has to
be configured for sandbox components when inheriting from commons parent
(instead of commons sandbox parent) can be reviewed in BeanUtils2 [1].
I'll update the other sandbox components, when I find the time.
Regards,
Benedi
Hi all,
as discussed, I'd like to propose to move Apache Commons Betwixt to
dormant.
Reasons:
- no real activity for a long while [1]
- last release was in 2008
- No need for Betwixt with JAXB around
So please cast your votes:
This vote will close no sooner that 72 hours from now, i.e. after 21:
Since nobody seems to have objections, I'll start a vote about this.
2014-03-08 13:01 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> Hi all,
>
> with JAXB around, do we still need Betwixt or can we move it to dormant?
> The last release was in 2008 and I don't see any interest in keeping the
> component alive. I
SCXML developers,
I've just created a first Commons SCXML 2.0-M0 milestone tag as baseline for the
roadmap [1] towards Commons SCXML 2.0.
Please read the roadmap for further details.
It would be great if you can test this first baseline to validate everything is
still working as expected, for
On 11-03-14 12:24, sebb wrote:
On 11 March 2014 09:11, Ate Douma wrote:
On 11-03-14 01:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
IMO, if you make artifacts available through MC, then it is a "release",
whatever you label it, alpha, beta, milestone, and so on, which requires a
VOTE.
Right. Although in my boo
On 11 March 2014 09:11, Ate Douma wrote:
> On 11-03-14 01:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
>>
>> IMO, if you make artifacts available through MC, then it is a "release",
>> whatever you label it, alpha, beta, milestone, and so on, which requires a
>> VOTE.
>
>
> Right. Although in my book at the ASF we onl
On 11-03-14 10:11, Ate Douma wrote:
On 11-03-14 01:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
IMO, if you make artifacts available through MC, then it is a "release",
whatever you label it, alpha, beta, milestone, and so on, which requires a
VOTE.
Right. Although in my book at the ASF we only formally VOTE on s
On 11-03-14 01:00, Gary Gregory wrote:
IMO, if you make artifacts available through MC, then it is a "release",
whatever you label it, alpha, beta, milestone, and so on, which requires a
VOTE.
Right. Although in my book at the ASF we only formally VOTE on source releases,
never on binary artif
12 matches
Mail list logo
