IMO, if you make artifacts available through MC, then it is a "release",
whatever you label it, alpha, beta, milestone, and so on, which requires a
VOTE.
If you do not make it available through MC, then you can use an SVN
revision # or a tag for a more developer oriented milestone marker.
Gary
Hi,
I just published a high-level roadmap plan towards SCXML 2.0 [1]
Part of that plan, which consists of working through a set of milestone targets,
is also tagging these milestones "as is", see [2].
As I also described there, these milestone tags will "not represent a formal
release and th
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to get rid of Sandbox parent pom. The only thing it adds IMHO is
> that the site build picks up the correct URLs by setting some properties.
> We always have to release a new sandbox parent when commons parent is
> released.
>
> How about overriding the
makes sense, +1
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 1:37 PM, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 08/03/2014 13:04, Benedikt Ritter a écrit :
>
> > Thoughts?
>
> I would even suggest getting rid of the physical distinction between the
> sandbo
Le 09/03/2014 08:52, Stefan Bodewig a écrit :
> Hi all
>
> I talked about cutting Compress 1.8 in particular because of
> COMPRESS-264 but delayed it waiting for a new XZ for Java release.
>
> Compress 1.8 RC1 is available for review here:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/co
