Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 based on RC2

2014-03-04 Thread Matt Benson
On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 9:22 PM, Gary Gregory wrote: > Can the FAQ talk about [weaver] vs. ASM (http://asm.ow2.org/)? > > Your question suggests that there is some opposition between the two, when in fact the two provided Weavers are implemented with ASM. Can you pose a question that might then be

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 based on RC2

2014-03-04 Thread Gary Gregory
Can the FAQ talk about [weaver] vs. ASM (http://asm.ow2.org/)? Gary On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:19 PM, Matt Benson wrote: > On Mar 4, 2014 8:47 PM, "Bruno P. Kinoshita" > wrote: > > > > Hi Matt! Kudos for the hard work on [weaver]. > > > > - commons-weaver-processor has 5 unknown licenses in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 based on RC2

2014-03-04 Thread Matt Benson
On Mar 4, 2014 8:47 PM, "Bruno P. Kinoshita" wrote: > > Hi Matt! Kudos for the hard work on [weaver]. > > - commons-weaver-processor has 5 unknown licenses in RAT report > - commons-weaver-maven-plugin has 1 unknown license in RAT report > Argh, I think I'll fix these and reroll. Thanks for bring

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 based on RC2

2014-03-04 Thread Bruno P. Kinoshita
Hi Matt! Kudos for the hard work on [weaver]. - commons-weaver-processor has 5 unknown licenses in RAT report - commons-weaver-maven-plugin has 1 unknown license in RAT report Building from tag with mvn clean install && mvn site:site site:stage works fine for me, all tests passed, site generated

[VOTE] Release Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 based on RC2

2014-03-04 Thread Matt Benson
Apache Commons Weaver 1.0 RC2 is available for review at: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/weaver/ (r4567). Maven artifacts are at: https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1015/ . Tested with Oracle JDKs 6, 7 and 8. The Subversion tag is: http://s

[ANNOUNCEMENT] Apache Commons DBCP 2.0 released

2014-03-04 Thread Mark Thomas
The Apache Commons Team is pleased to announce the release of Apache Commons DBCP 2.0. The Apache Commons DBCP open source software library provides Database Connection Pooling. DBCP 2.x is based on Commons Pool 2 and provides increased performance, JMX support as well as numerous other new featu

Re: [math] fitting.leastsquares and stat.regression

2014-03-04 Thread Evan Ward
Phil suggested we discuss the relationship of the two least squares packages in [math] Current Status Currently both fitting.leastsquares and stat.regression have least squares implementations. The fitting.leastsquares package supports non-linear least squares with weights, pluggable optimization

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3 based on RC1

2014-03-04 Thread Benedikt Ritter
Hi, more than 72 hours have passed. Commons Lang 3.3 will be released based on RC1 with the following votes: Gary Gregory: +1 Oliver Heger: +1 Benedikt Ritter: +1 Jörg Schaible: +1 All votes are binding, no other votes have been casted. I'll promote the artifacts and send the announcement as soo

Re: [VOTE] Release Commons Lang 3.3 based on RC1

2014-03-04 Thread Benedikt Ritter
2014-03-03 19:28 GMT+01:00 Jörg Schaible : > > +1, > > builds for me from source with my compiler zoo and anything is fine apart > from those two test failures with Java 8. > Only Chuck Norris can create a RC that builds on all of Jörg's JDKs ;-) > > - Jörg > > Benedikt Ritter wrote: > > > Hi a

Re: svn commit: r1573561 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/DelegatingConnection.java

2014-03-04 Thread Gary Gregory
For Java 6 projects, I always use isEmpty(), unless the size needs to be cached for some reason. Gary On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 10:10 AM, Simone Tripodi wrote: > yeah that was my curiosity/question/concern: should both methods have 0 > impact on performances or not? > > I have no preferences as we

Re: svn commit: r1573561 - /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/DelegatingConnection.java

2014-03-04 Thread Simone Tripodi
yeah that was my curiosity/question/concern: should both methods have 0 impact on performances or not? I have no preferences as well, as Gary pointed on it reads better to me as well but that's definitively not an issue :) best, -Simo http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/ http://twitter.com/si