On Sat, Mar 1, 2014 at 6:50 PM, André Diermann wrote:
> But will upgrading to 1.7 will solve the core "issue", that some features
> (in detail: Assertions, MethodUitl and TypeUtil) are copied subsets of
> already implemented features in other Commons projects?
>
Commons Lang actually copied Metho
On 03/03/2014 16:31, Gary Gregory wrote:
> It reads better to me.
>
> Gary
>
> Original message
> From: Simone Tripodi
> Date:03/03/2014 10:40 (GMT-05:00)
> To: Commons Developers List
> Subject: Re: svn commit: r1573561 -
> /commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/main/java/org/a
+1,
builds for me from source with my compiler zoo and anything is fine apart
from those two test failures with Java 8.
- Jörg
Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> we've quite few bugs fixed and some nice new features, so I'd like to
> release Commons Lang 3.3 based on RC1.
>
> Commons Lang
It reads better to me.
Gary
Original message
From: Simone Tripodi
Date:03/03/2014 10:40 (GMT-05:00)
To: Commons Developers List
Subject: Re: svn commit: r1573561 -
/commons/proper/dbcp/trunk/src/main/java/org/apache/commons/dbcp2/DelegatingConnection.java
Hi there,
ju
Hi there,
just a matter of curiosity: would
+if(traces != null && !traces.isEmpty() {
be better or not compared to
+if(traces != null && traces.size() > 0) {
That should be the same, right?
TIA all the best
-Simo
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://twitter.com/simon
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 8:36 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Okay, so how would you feel if BU2 would depend on Java 7 instead of Java
> 6? Is this acceptable from your PoV?
>
Not that you asked me ;) but I'm OK with that.
Gary
>
>
> 2014-03-03 14:10 GMT+01:00 Adrian Crum >:
>
> > The Assertions
Okay, so how would you feel if BU2 would depend on Java 7 instead of Java
6? Is this acceptable from your PoV?
2014-03-03 14:10 GMT+01:00 Adrian Crum :
> The Assertions class works fine and it serves its purpose. There is no
> need to make the library dependent on another library.
>
> Going that
The Assertions class works fine and it serves its purpose. There is no
need to make the library dependent on another library.
Going that route, as a developer/user of the library, I would be forced
to download and install two libraries instead of one. So it is more
complication and work for me
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:05 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014-03-01 21:06 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger :
>
> > Am 01.03.2014 18:37, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> > > Hi Simo,
> > >
> > > this is a nice idea, and I think it's doable for parts of the API. The
> > > problem is, that it may require a lot of w
Hi,
I have the three required votes to release lang 3.3. Nevertheless, I would
like to see some more reviews please. So if you have the time, please
review this RC.
Since I got this question from the community I'll answer it here for all:
Anybody from the community is invited to vote, not only me
Online report :
https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=28311&projectId=97
Build statistics:
State: Failed
Previous State: Failed
Started at: Mon 3 Mar 2014 10:44:27 +
Finished at: Mon 3 Mar 2014 10:49:33 +
Total time: 5m 5s
Build Trigger: Schedule
go for it! :)
http://people.apache.org/~simonetripodi/
http://twitter.com/simonetripodi
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 10:53 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello André
>
> 2014-03-03 9:57 GMT+01:00 André Diermann :
>
> > 2014-03-03 9:10 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> > >
> > >
> > > The stuff that we hav
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> 2014-03-02 11:42 GMT+01:00 Simone Tripodi :
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > between all options, Matt's one would be the one I'd support.
> >
>
> Shading may be a solution. But tbh I don't see a problem here. We can
> replace Assertions wit
Hello André
2014-03-03 9:57 GMT+01:00 André Diermann :
> 2014-03-03 9:10 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
> >
> >
> > The stuff that we have implemented in the Assertions class can be
> replaced
> > by the methods available in Objects from java 7. You're right about
> > MethodUtil and TypeUtil.
> >
>
The following votes were cast:
Binding:
+1: ggregory, markt, britter, psteitz
No other votes were cast.
The vote therefore passes.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@commons.apache.org
For additional commands, e-ma
2014-03-03 9:10 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter :
>
>
> The stuff that we have implemented in the Assertions class can be replaced
> by the methods available in Objects from java 7. You're right about
> MethodUtil and TypeUtil.
>
>
Just to be clear what you mean by replace:
- wrapping the methods from Ob
Hi all,
with some guidance of you guys, I would like to help you with the porting.
Sounds interesting to me!
For instance, someone of you, with an overview of what to do in general,
need to specify the required steps to go in JIRA and I can go them for you
:)
Regards,
André
2014-03-03 9:05 GMT
Hi,
2014-03-02 11:42 GMT+01:00 Simone Tripodi :
> Hi all,
>
> between all options, Matt's one would be the one I'd support.
>
Shading may be a solution. But tbh I don't see a problem here. We can
replace Assertions with Objects. That leaves us with MethodUtil (which
currently only provides dete
Hi André
2014-03-01 19:50 GMT+01:00 André Diermann :
> But will upgrading to 1.7 will solve the core "issue", that some features
> (in detail: Assertions, MethodUitl and TypeUtil) are copied subsets of
> already implemented features in other Commons projects?
>
The stuff that we have implemente
Hi Adrian
2014-03-02 8:03 GMT+01:00 Adrian Crum :
> On 3/1/2014 9:33 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> I don't like the idea of creating some kind of component hierarchy, where
>> components higher up may depend on lower levels libs. This should be
>> decided for every individual case.
>>
>
> I ag
2014-03-01 21:06 GMT+01:00 Oliver Heger :
> Am 01.03.2014 18:37, schrieb Benedikt Ritter:
> > Hi Simo,
> >
> > this is a nice idea, and I think it's doable for parts of the API. The
> > problem is, that it may require a lot of work and I don't see anybody who
> > has the time to do this currently
21 matches
Mail list logo
