Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.2 RC2 as 2.2

On 2014-02-21, Mark Thomas wrote: > The Pool 2.2 RC2 is available for review here: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/commons/pool/ (r4457) > Maven artifacts are here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachecommons-1009 > Details of changes since 2.1 are in the r

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.2 RC2 as 2.2

Hi, +1 builds from source with my compiler zoo. However, the manifest contains the following line: Implementation-Build: UNKNOWN_BRANCH@r??; 2014-02-21 14:40:13+ Maybe we should stop adding it in future, is does not make sense. - Jörg Mark Thomas wrote: > 2.2 fixes a few bugs and a

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons JCS - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=28198&projectId=286 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 22 Feb 2014 21:20:28 + Finished at: Sat 22 Feb 2014 21:23:52 + Total time: 3m 24s Build Trigger: Sche

[continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons JCS - Apache Commons (Group (shared) Maven 3 Build Definition (Java 1.6))

Online report : https://continuum-ci.apache.org/continuum/buildResult.action?buildId=28197&projectId=286 Build statistics: State: Failed Previous State: Failed Started at: Sat 22 Feb 2014 20:22:01 + Finished at: Sat 22 Feb 2014 20:25:22 + Total time: 3m 20s Build Trigger: Sche

Re: [Continuum] recent spurious build failure messages

Thanks for following up on this, Seb, and restoring my good name! Matt On Feb 22, 2014 2:53 AM, "sebb" wrote: > In case people were wondering, here is why we started getting some > spurious build failure messages recently from Continuum. > > S. > -- Forwarded message -- > From: B

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Commons Pool 2.2 RC2 as 2.2

Build with Maven and ant is successful on Windows 8.1 with Java 1.7. Artifacts and site look good. +1 One minor point: I noticed that the binary distribution does not contain the sources and the tests jars. IIRC, they were contained in RC1. Is this by intension? Oliver Am 21.02.2014 17:26, schr

[collections] Issues with MultiMap generics and need of a MultiTrie

Hello, Recently I had the need of using a MultiMap in one of my projects. I found that commons collection already has a MultiMap interface and an implementation. While using the same, I found that the MultiMap interface has methods that are not strongly typed even though the interface supports g

[LANG] Recent RC preparations

Hi all, I had 3.3 RC1 almost ready when I realized, that I had forgotten to update the site to 3.3. I've dropped the RC, since there has been no vote yet. I don't have more time today to recreate the RC, but I'll take care of that tomorrow. Regards, Benedikt -- http://people.apache.org/~britte

Re: [VOTE] Move Commons Attributes to dormant

My own +1 FTR 2014-02-20 19:48 GMT+01:00 Benedikt Ritter : > Hi all, > > I'd like to call a vote for moving Commons Attributes to dormant. > > Reasons: > - years have passed since the last real activity in attributes [1]. > - the last release is from 2006. > - the code is pre Java 5. > > So p

[Continuum] recent spurious build failure messages

In case people were wondering, here is why we started getting some spurious build failure messages recently from Continuum. S. -- Forwarded message -- From: Brett Porter Date: 22 February 2014 01:48 Subject: Re: [continuum] BUILD FAILURE: Apache Commons - Apache Commons Parent - C