On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 2:56 PM, Oliver Heger
wrote:
> Maven build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.7 on Windows 7. The ant build
> was successful, too. Artifacts and site look good.
>
> So +1.
>
> I tried to test the build with a JDK 1.4 using the profile, but got the
> error
> java.lang.Unsupported
I don't think I really did anything. ;-)
On Jan 4, 2014 7:00 AM, "Bruno P. Kinoshita"
wrote:
> Thanks Benedikt! It was fun digging into this issue. Matt helped me too
> after you left the #apache-commons channel.
>
> I'll have a few cycles to work on open source tools this weekend and for
> the n
Hi Oliver,
Oliver Heger wrote:
> Maven build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.7 on Windows 7. The ant build
> was successful, too. Artifacts and site look good.
>
> So +1.
>
> I tried to test the build with a JDK 1.4 using the profile, but got the
> error
> java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
After having fixed BEANUTILS-456 [1], I am thinking about getting out a
1.9.1 bug fix release.
Any comments about this plan or wishes about other things to be included?
Oliver
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/BEANUTILS-456
---
Maven build works fine with Java 1.5 and 1.7 on Windows 7. The ant build
was successful, too. Artifacts and site look good.
So +1.
I tried to test the build with a JDK 1.4 using the profile, but got the
error
java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError:
org/apache/maven/surefire/booter/ForkedBooter (U
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
>
>> 2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
>>
>> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
>> > wrote:
>> >
>> > > Hello Hen
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
>> > >
>> > > >
On Sat, Jan 4, 2014 at 3:14 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> 2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
>
> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello Hen
> > >
> > >
> > > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm +1 for calendar defined minor releases btw. I think we should
On Fri, 03 Jan 2014 21:17:43 +0100, Thomas Neidhart wrote:
On 12/28/2013 06:35 PM, Gilles wrote:
Hi.
I've just attached the proposed implementation:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MATH-923
It is part of a new package "o.a.c.m.ml.neuralnet" that is supposed
to contain tools for creating
On 1/4/14, 12:29 AM, Henri Yandell wrote:
> To Sebb and Bendikt:
>
> I'm ambivalent on whether the reports are release version or snapshot, I
> can see value in both (one encourages users, the other contributors).
> However the site _has_ to be trunk. Having to do a new release just so we
> can upd
On 4 January 2014 08:29, Henri Yandell wrote:
> To Sebb and Bendikt:
>
> I'm ambivalent on whether the reports are release version or snapshot, I
> can see value in both (one encourages users, the other contributors).
> However the site _has_ to be trunk. Having to do a new release just so we
> ca
Thanks Benedikt! It was fun digging into this issue. Matt helped me too after
you left the #apache-commons channel.
I'll have a few cycles to work on open source tools this weekend and for the
next days (things are slow here till after the Carnival).
I'll try to send a patch to this issue and
2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
> To Sebb and Bendikt:
>
> I'm ambivalent on whether the reports are release version or snapshot, I
> can see value in both (one encourages users, the other contributors).
>
IMHO for the latter group tools like Sonar are far better suited, since
they are more up to date. T
2014/1/4 Henri Yandell
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter
> wrote:
>
> > Hello Hen
> >
> >
> > 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
> >
> > > Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> > > implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want
> t
Hi all,
I'd like to thank Bruno for his great work in tracking down the cause of
LANG-942 [1]. Not only did he install several JDK7 and JDK8 on his machine
and in his Windows box for several different time zones, he also diffed
affected JDK classes between JDK7 and JDK8.
Bruno, you did a great jo
Gary Gregory wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 11:08 AM, sebb wrote:
>
>> On 3 January 2014 15:04, Gary Gregory wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 6:36 AM, Jörg Schaible
>> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Hi Gary,
>> >>
>> >> I tried to build from source with my compiler zoo. I cannot test Java
>> 1.3
>> >> c
To Sebb and Bendikt:
I'm ambivalent on whether the reports are release version or snapshot, I
can see value in both (one encourages users, the other contributors).
However the site _has_ to be trunk. Having to do a new release just so we
can update the site doesn't strike me as healthy.
To Gary:
On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:35 AM, Benedikt Ritter wrote:
> Hello Hen
>
>
> 2014/1/3 Henri Yandell
>
> > Better move quick on 3.2.1. Only bit I don't like about that is that it
> > implies we shouldn't be committing anything that would lead us to want to
> > have a 3.3.
>
>
> I'm working on getting
17 matches
Mail list logo
